The structure of the article:

1. Universal Decimal Classification Index (UDC).
2. Article title.
3. Initials and surname of the author (s).
4. Abstract.
5. Keywords.
6. The text of the article with tables, figures, formulas.
7. References.
8. Information about the author (s): surname, name, patronymic; academic degree; academic title; position, place of work; telephone, e-mail address (e-mail), a unique number of the scientist (ORCID).

Compliance requirements of publication ethics apply to all members of the publishing process – authors, editors, reviewers, and the publisher of the journal. The editorial board monitors compliance with the ethics requirements based on the manuals prepared by specialized organizations, and publishers, as well as the Association of Science Editors and Publishers (ASEP). The main standards relied on by the journal Bulletin of Kemerovo State University are those developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (United Kingdom), by the publisher Elsevier (Netherlands), and the Declaration "Ethical Principles of Scientific Publications" (adopted by ASEP). 

The responsibility of editors

1. The editors are personally and independently responsible for the content of the materials published.
2. The editors make fair and objective decisions, regardless of any commercial interest and provide a fair and efficient process for the independent review.
3. The editors evaluate manuscripts' intellectual content, adhering to the principle of equality of Authors.
4. The editors do not work with articles for which they have a conflict of interest.
5. The editors resolve conflict situations arising during the editorial process.
6. The editors of the journal publish information concerning corrections, rebuttals, and review articles in case the need arises.
7. The editors do publish the final version of the article  only after agreement with the authors.
8. The editors correctly conduct correspondence with authors and reviewers, timely respond to letters.

The responsibility of the reviewers

1. The reviewer evaluates his or her own availability before the examination of the manuscript and accepts materials for review only if the reviewer is able to allow for sufficient time as to ensure the quality his or her work.
2. The reviewer notifies the editorial staff of any conflict of interest (if one exists) before the start of the review of the article.
3. The reviewer does not send information about the article and or any of the data contained within the article to any third party, and does not use the information obtained from the article for any personal and or commercial purposes.
4. The reviewer draws conclusions about the quality of the article based on objective data, without expressing a personal relationship to the author.
5. The reviewer uses only proper and appropriate language and explanations in respect to the articles, avoiding any personal remarks.
6. The reviewer correctly conduct correspondence with editors, timely respond to letters.

The responsibility of the authors

1. The author is responsible for the accuracy of the data presented in the article, and guarantees the originality of its content.
2. The author notifies the editors if the article is based on previously published materials.
3. The author does not submit the same article to different journals for review.
4. All co-authors consent to the submission of their articles to the journal.
5. The author informs the editorial staff of a potential conflict of interest.
6. The author correctly cites his or her previous works and others' works, avoids self-plagiarism and an artificial increase in the volume of publications.
7. The list of authors included only individuals who have made significant contributions to the research.
8. If necessary, the authors either adjust the data presented in the article, or refute them.
9. The author, who is acting as the contact with journal, informs all other co-authors of all changes and suggestions from the editorial staff, and does not make decisions regarding the article alone without the written consent of all co-authors.
10. The author correctly conduct correspondence with editors, timely respond to letters.

The responsibility of the publisher

1. Publisher supports scientific communications, finances this process, is responsible for adhering to the principles and procedures that contribute to the ethical duties of all participants in the editorial and publishing process.
2. The publisher does not affect the editorial policy of the journal.
3. The publisher provides legal support to the journal if necessary.
4. The publisher provides for the timely release of next issues of the journal.

1. General
   • We accept manuscripts of original articles and reviews in Russian and English.
   • The authors guarantee that:
     • they own the exclusive copyright for the manuscript they submit;
     • they publication will not infringe a third party’s copyright;
     • the manuscript has never been published;
     • they did not submit it to any other journal;
     • the list of authors includes only those who contributed to the research.
     • they agree with the Publication Ethics of the journal.
2. Submission procedure
   • E-mail us your manuscript and additional materials or upload them as separate files using your personal account on our website.
   • If you previously submitted this article to some other journal but it was not accepted for publication, please inform us in your letter lest we should accidentally reject your manuscript after the initial check-up.
   • Please remember that the Editors do not enter into correspondence with Authors to discuss the content, methods, or formatting of the articles submitted. Neither do we improve the scientific and methodological quality of the paper. 
3. Registration and Initial Check-Up
   • The registration and initial check-up stage normally take five days. We will e-mail you about the current status of your manuscript. If you did not get a letter from us within five days, it means that we did not receive your submission due to some technical problem. Please send your letter again or call +7(3842)58-13-01.
   • The Editor checks all submitted manuscripts for compliance with the profile of The Bulletin, Publishing Ethics (plagiarism, doubling, etc.), and formatting requirements (text volume, structure, number of keywords, abstract volume, references, in-text references, information about the Authors, etc.)
   • If your article is beyond the scope of the Bulletin or violates our Publishing Ethics, you will receive a substantiated rejection letter.
   • If the submitted article does not meet our formatting requirements, it will be returned to you for revision and improvement. 
   • Should you fail to e-mail us the improved version within 10 days, your next attempt will automatically be classified as a new submission.
   • Please visit our website to find out more about formatting requirements.
4. If the manuscript passes the initial check-up, it will be peer-reviewed by two experts in accordance with the rules established by the Editorial. The review process is double-blind to provide anonymity for both authors and reviewers.
5. Admission Procedure
   • After your manuscript has been approved for publication, the Editor will inform you by e-mail and state the approximate publication date.
   • We do not guarantee that your manuscript will be published in the next issue: the review procedure usually takes some time.
   • We can provide you with an official letter that your manuscript has been accepted for publication. Do not hesitate to request a confirmation letter, if needed.
   • A publishing license agreement is signed by the Author(s) after the article is recommended for publication.
   • Papers are published depending on the registration date and editorial plans. Articles on topical issues and break-through research can be published out of turn by the decision of the Editor-in-Chief.
6. Editing and Publishing
   • All manuscripts are published only after they undergo literary editing and proofreading.
   • All changes made by the Editor require your consent by e-mail.
   • You will receive the typeset article for final approval before publication.
   • All articles have a printed and online version.

1. After your paper has successfully passed the initial check-up stage, it will have to undergo a double review. The reviewer reviews the manuscript without knowledge of the authors' names. Likewise, the author does not know the name of the reviewer. Correspondence between the author and the reviewer takes place via e-mail in the edition on the journal.
2. Reviewers will be appointed by the editorial board. The peer review can be conducted by the members of the Editorial Board or by acknowledged academic specialists in the sphere.
3. Reviewers follow the rules of publication ethics established by the editorial board.
4. Appointed reviewers can refuse to analyze the manuscript in case there is a conflict of interest or if they cannot provide an unbiased review for some reason.
5. Reviews (review sample) are written in free form; however, they clarify the following compulsory aspects:

• Does the paper correspond with the profile of the journal?Is the topic relevant?
• Does the paper possess any theoretical and practical significance?
• Is the author’s approach novel?
• Is the style scientific and clear?

6. We will normally send you anonymous reviews of you paper within 21-60 days.
7. The reviews contain one of the following recommendations:

• publish the paper as it is;
• publish the paper after it has been improved according to the recommendations of the reviewers if the author agrees to make such improvements;
• publish the paper only after it has been improved according to the recommendations of the reviewers;
• reject the manuscript with the right to resubmit it;
• reject the manuscript with no future resubmission.

8. Your manuscript might have to undergo an extra review if considered necessary.
9. In case the editor e-mails you a list of suggested improvements, you can accept them or to give a substantiated refusal.
10. Please e-mail your improved variant back to the editor within 30 days; otherwise your manuscript will have to start from square one.
11. Your improved version has to be accompanied by a cover letter as a separate file (Name_answer) where you will have to respond to the criticism and explain all the improvements you have made in your paper (Name_paper_improved). Please highlight all the improvements in the text.
12. If the reviews are negative, you will be sent a substantiated rejection letter signed by the chief editor or the deputy editor.
13. In case of rejection, you may challenge our decision by sending a letter of appeal to the chief editor. In your letter, please, explain why your manuscript should be reconsidered. Enclose an improved version of your paper, if necessary. Please, mind that the decision made by the chief editor is final and cannot be challenged.
14. The chief editor considers the final edited version of every paper, reviews, and the author’s response and makes the final decision (approved / returned to the author for further revision / rejected). After that, the editor will inform you about the final decision of the chief editor within 10 days.
15. Should you need a copy of the reviews, do not hesitate to send us your request. Mind that the copy will be anonymous.
16. Copies of all reviews can be submitted to the Supreme Qualifying Committee upon request.
17. Original reviews are stored in the editorial office for 5 years.
18. In case the authors do not respond to the constructive feedback from the reviewers or the editor, the manuscript is likely to be rejected.

The Editors of the Bulletin of Kemerovo State University adhere to the following retraction policy:

The editors can retract a published article to inform the readers that the article contains faulty / unreliable data, plagiarisms, an unreported conflict of interests, or doubling, i.e. if new information has been revealed that can affect the interpretation of the published data or recommendations on their use.

Therefore, an article can be retracted if the Editors found out that

• the article violates the ethics of scientific publishing;
• the author(s) published one and the same data or manuscript in several journals without a serious reason, authorization, or cross reference;
• the bulk of the article was copied prom a previously published work by a different author;
• if the article contains invalid data, be it the result of a deliberate violation, miscalculation, experimental error, or misprint.

Retraction can be initiated by authors, readers, reviewers, editors, and other publishers by officially appealing to the Editorial Board. An expertise conducted by the Editorial Board can also trigger a retraction procedure.

If the Editorial Board failed to answer a retraction claim from the author within 10 days, the author is free to appeal to the Society of Science Editors and Publishers.

If the Editorial Board decides to retract the article based on the violations mentioned above, the corresponding author is sent a notification that explains the reasons for the retraction. The final decision takes into account the explanation given by the author. Should the author fail to respond within 10 days, the Editors are free to retract the publication without the author’s concern. Irrespective of the fact whether the authors accept the standpoint of the editorial board or not, the retraction is an abiding procedure.

The retraction protocol is sent to the corresponding author, the Society of Science Editors and Publishers, eLIBRARY.RU, and CUBERLENINKA e-libraries. A retraction note, which states its reason and date, is published both in paper and online versions of the Journal. After that, the article will be marked as RETRACTED in all reference databases. Retracted articles are excluded from all citation indices and reference lists and do not affect electronic calculations of one’s personal scientific achievements.

After the retraction procedure has been completed, the Editorial Board retains the right not to accept other manuscripts submitted by the author(s) in question for a certain period.

The printed version of the journal "Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences" is distributed through a subscription in the catalog "Press of Russia" (subscription index – 94232).

You can purchase individual issues of the printed version of the journal «Bulletin of Kemerovo State University» through noncash settlement:

For legal entities it is necessary to send an order in the official form to the editorial office via e-mail, specifying:

• issue number and year of issue of the journal,
• quantity (number of copies),
• organization's requisites for billings,
• corresponding person.

For private persons: you can buy the issue of the journal by paying at any bank according to the details. It is necessary to make sure that the issue you need is available in the editorial office.
The paid-off issues may be collected at the editorial office of the journal at the address: 650000, Russia, Kemerovo, Sovetskii ave. 73, 125.

The mail delivery is also possible to the regions and Countries (after paying), for which it's necessary to give the address with Zip code for sending an issue of the journal.

The cost of one copy – ₽ 750 excluding shipping, ₽ 950. – with shipment in Russia.

Pay online  (!) How to make a payment

Scientific journal "Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series:  Humanities and Social Sciences" is a peer-reviewed scientific journal published since 2017 with a frequency of 4 times a year.

The Bulletin is registered by The Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology, and Mass Media, Registration Certificate PI № FS 77 – 67379. The International Standard Serial Issue (ISSN) of the Journal is 2542-1840 (print), 2541-9145 (online).

The journal publishes original scientific and review articles, reviews in the following areas: Pedagogical sciences (General pedagogy, history of pedagogy and education; Theory and methodology of teaching and education (by areas and levels of preschool and school education); Correctional pedagogy; Theory and methods of professional education); Jurisprudence (Civil law, Business law, Family law, International private law; Constitutional law; municipal law; Criminal law and criminology).

All articles submitted to the editor are subject to mandatory double-blind review. Reviewers will be appointed by the editorial board. The double-blind peer review can be conducted by the members of the Editorial Board or by acknowledged academic specialists in the sphere.

"Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences" use native Russian-language plagiarism detection software Antiplagiat to screen the submissions. If plagiarism is identified, the COPE guidelines on plagiarism will be followed.

The Journal provides direct open access to its content, based on the following principle: free open access to research results contributes to an increase in global knowledge sharing.  The electronic version of the journal is available for viewing on the site of the publication, on the platforms of the Scientific Electronic Library eLIBRARY.RU, the CyberLeninka Scientific Electronic Library and on the Lan system of the electronic library system. The journal is included in some databases: Dimensions, European Reference Index for the Humanities, and the Social Sciences (ERIH PLUS), Russian Science Citation Index (RISC), Scilit, Socionet, EBSCO.

All articles included in the journal “Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Political, Sociological, and Economic sciences” are published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).

Each issue of the Bulletin should be certainly sent to the federal government agency for the press, mass media, and mass communications, to the Russian Central Institute of Bibliography, and to other leading libraries, educational and scientific institutions of the Russian Federation.

The Journal is financed by the Founder and does not charge authors for fees for reviewing, preparing a journal for printing, publishing, as well as for placing articles in Open Access and site content.

 Address of the Founder, Publisher: 6 Krasnaya St., Kemerovo, Kemerovo region (Kuzbass), Russia, 650000; 8(3842)58-12-26; rector@kemsu.ru

Editorial Office Address: off. 2125, 6 Krasnaya St., Kemerovo, Kemerovo region (Kuzbass), Russia, 650000

Contacts for co-operation:
Lyudmila  Starikova, Editor; vestkemsu@gmail.com
Ekaterina Pechenkina, Editor; j.juredu@yandex.ru

The structure of the article:

1. Universal Decimal Classification Index (UDC).
2. Article title.
3. Initials and surname of the author (s).
4. Abstract.
5. Keywords.
6. The text of the article with tables, figures, formulas.
7. References.
8. Information about the author (s): surname, name, patronymic; academic degree; academic title; position, place of work; telephone, e-mail address (e-mail), a unique number of the scientist (ORCID).

Compliance requirements of publication ethics apply to all members of the publishing process – authors, editors, reviewers, and the publisher of the journal. The editorial board monitors compliance with the ethics requirements based on the manuals prepared by specialized organizations, and publishers, as well as the Association of Science Editors and Publishers (ASEP). The main standards relied on by the journal Bulletin of Kemerovo State University are those developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (United Kingdom), by the publisher Elsevier (Netherlands), and the Declaration "Ethical Principles of Scientific Publications" (adopted by ASEP). 

The responsibility of editors

1. The editors are personally and independently responsible for the content of the materials published.
2. The editors make fair and objective decisions, regardless of any commercial interest and provide a fair and efficient process for the independent review.
3. The editors evaluate manuscripts' intellectual content, adhering to the principle of equality of Authors.
4. The editors do not work with articles for which they have a conflict of interest.
5. The editors resolve conflict situations arising during the editorial process.
6. The editors of the journal publish information concerning corrections, rebuttals, and review articles in case the need arises.
7. The editors do publish the final version of the article  only after agreement with the authors.
8. The editors correctly conduct correspondence with authors and reviewers, timely respond to letters.

The responsibility of the reviewers

1. The reviewer evaluates his or her own availability before the examination of the manuscript and accepts materials for review only if the reviewer is able to allow for sufficient time as to ensure the quality his or her work.
2. The reviewer notifies the editorial staff of any conflict of interest (if one exists) before the start of the review of the article.
3. The reviewer does not send information about the article and or any of the data contained within the article to any third party, and does not use the information obtained from the article for any personal and or commercial purposes.
4. The reviewer draws conclusions about the quality of the article based on objective data, without expressing a personal relationship to the author.
5. The reviewer uses only proper and appropriate language and explanations in respect to the articles, avoiding any personal remarks.
6. The reviewer correctly conduct correspondence with editors, timely respond to letters.

The responsibility of the authors

1. The author is responsible for the accuracy of the data presented in the article, and guarantees the originality of its content.
2. The author notifies the editors if the article is based on previously published materials.
3. The author does not submit the same article to different journals for review.
4. All co-authors consent to the submission of their articles to the journal.
5. The author informs the editorial staff of a potential conflict of interest.
6. The author correctly cites his or her previous works and others' works, avoids self-plagiarism and an artificial increase in the volume of publications.
7. The list of authors included only individuals who have made significant contributions to the research.
8. If necessary, the authors either adjust the data presented in the article, or refute them.
9. The author, who is acting as the contact with journal, informs all other co-authors of all changes and suggestions from the editorial staff, and does not make decisions regarding the article alone without the written consent of all co-authors.
10. The author correctly conduct correspondence with editors, timely respond to letters.

The responsibility of the publisher

1. Publisher supports scientific communications, finances this process, is responsible for adhering to the principles and procedures that contribute to the ethical duties of all participants in the editorial and publishing process.
2. The publisher does not affect the editorial policy of the journal.
3. The publisher provides legal support to the journal if necessary.
4. The publisher provides for the timely release of next issues of the journal.

1. General
   • We accept manuscripts of original articles and reviews in Russian and English.
   • The authors guarantee that:
     • they own the exclusive copyright for the manuscript they submit;
     • they publication will not infringe a third party’s copyright;
     • the manuscript has never been published;
     • they did not submit it to any other journal;
     • the list of authors includes only those who contributed to the research.
     • they agree with the Publication Ethics of the journal.
2. Submission procedure
   • E-mail us your manuscript and additional materials or upload them as separate files using your personal account on our website.
   • If you previously submitted this article to some other journal but it was not accepted for publication, please inform us in your letter lest we should accidentally reject your manuscript after the initial check-up.
   • Please remember that the Editors do not enter into correspondence with Authors to discuss the content, methods, or formatting of the articles submitted. Neither do we improve the scientific and methodological quality of the paper. 
3. Registration and Initial Check-Up
   • The registration and initial check-up stage normally take five days. We will e-mail you about the current status of your manuscript. If you did not get a letter from us within five days, it means that we did not receive your submission due to some technical problem. Please send your letter again or call +7(3842)58-13-01.
   • The Editor checks all submitted manuscripts for compliance with the profile of The Bulletin, Publishing Ethics (plagiarism, doubling, etc.), and formatting requirements (text volume, structure, number of keywords, abstract volume, references, in-text references, information about the Authors, etc.)
   • If your article is beyond the scope of the Bulletin or violates our Publishing Ethics, you will receive a substantiated rejection letter.
   • If the submitted article does not meet our formatting requirements, it will be returned to you for revision and improvement. 
   • Should you fail to e-mail us the improved version within 10 days, your next attempt will automatically be classified as a new submission.
   • Please visit our website to find out more about formatting requirements.
4. If the manuscript passes the initial check-up, it will be peer-reviewed by two experts in accordance with the rules established by the Editorial. The review process is double-blind to provide anonymity for both authors and reviewers.
5. Admission Procedure
   • After your manuscript has been approved for publication, the Editor will inform you by e-mail and state the approximate publication date.
   • We do not guarantee that your manuscript will be published in the next issue: the review procedure usually takes some time.
   • We can provide you with an official letter that your manuscript has been accepted for publication. Do not hesitate to request a confirmation letter, if needed.
   • A publishing license agreement is signed by the Author(s) after the article is recommended for publication.
   • Papers are published depending on the registration date and editorial plans. Articles on topical issues and break-through research can be published out of turn by the decision of the Editor-in-Chief.
6. Editing and Publishing
   • All manuscripts are published only after they undergo literary editing and proofreading.
   • All changes made by the Editor require your consent by e-mail.
   • You will receive the typeset article for final approval before publication.
   • All articles have a printed and online version.

The Journal is financed by the Founder and does not charge authors for fees for reviewing, preparing a journal for printing, publishing, as well as for placing articles in Open Access and site content.

1. After your paper has successfully passed the initial check-up stage, it will have to undergo a double review. The reviewer reviews the manuscript without knowledge of the authors' names. Likewise, the author does not know the name of the reviewer. Correspondence between the author and the reviewer takes place via e-mail in the edition on the journal.
2. Reviewers will be appointed by the editorial board. The peer review can be conducted by the members of the Editorial Board or by acknowledged academic specialists in the sphere.
3. Reviewers follow the rules of publication ethics established by the editorial board.
4. Appointed reviewers can refuse to analyze the manuscript in case there is a conflict of interest or if they cannot provide an unbiased review for some reason.
5. Reviews (review sample) are written in free form; however, they clarify the following compulsory aspects:

• Does the paper correspond with the profile of the journal?Is the topic relevant?
• Does the paper possess any theoretical and practical significance?
• Is the author’s approach novel?
• Is the style scientific and clear?

6. We will normally send you anonymous reviews of you paper within 21-60 days.
7. The reviews contain one of the following recommendations:

• publish the paper as it is;
• publish the paper after it has been improved according to the recommendations of the reviewers if the author agrees to make such improvements;
• publish the paper only after it has been improved according to the recommendations of the reviewers;
• reject the manuscript with the right to resubmit it;
• reject the manuscript with no future resubmission.

8. Your manuscript might have to undergo an extra review if considered necessary.
9. In case the editor e-mails you a list of suggested improvements, you can accept them or to give a substantiated refusal.
10. Please e-mail your improved variant back to the editor within 30 days; otherwise your manuscript will have to start from square one.
11. Your improved version has to be accompanied by a cover letter as a separate file (Name_answer) where you will have to respond to the criticism and explain all the improvements you have made in your paper (Name_paper_improved). Please highlight all the improvements in the text.
12. If the reviews are negative, you will be sent a substantiated rejection letter signed by the chief editor or the deputy editor.
13. In case of rejection, you may challenge our decision by sending a letter of appeal to the chief editor. In your letter, please, explain why your manuscript should be reconsidered. Enclose an improved version of your paper, if necessary. Please, mind that the decision made by the chief editor is final and cannot be challenged.
14. The chief editor considers the final edited version of every paper, reviews, and the author’s response and makes the final decision (approved / returned to the author for further revision / rejected). After that, the editor will inform you about the final decision of the chief editor within 10 days.
15. Should you need a copy of the reviews, do not hesitate to send us your request. Mind that the copy will be anonymous.
16. Copies of all reviews can be submitted to the Supreme Qualifying Committee upon request.
17. Original reviews are stored in the editorial office for 5 years.
18. In case the authors do not respond to the constructive feedback from the reviewers or the editor, the manuscript is likely to be rejected.

The Editors of the Bulletin of Kemerovo State University adhere to the following retraction policy:

The editors can retract a published article to inform the readers that the article contains faulty / unreliable data, plagiarisms, an unreported conflict of interests, or doubling, i.e. if new information has been revealed that can affect the interpretation of the published data or recommendations on their use.

Therefore, an article can be retracted if the Editors found out that

• the article violates the ethics of scientific publishing;
• the author(s) published one and the same data or manuscript in several journals without a serious reason, authorization, or cross reference;
• the bulk of the article was copied prom a previously published work by a different author;
• if the article contains invalid data, be it the result of a deliberate violation, miscalculation, experimental error, or misprint.

Retraction can be initiated by authors, readers, reviewers, editors, and other publishers by officially appealing to the Editorial Board. An expertise conducted by the Editorial Board can also trigger a retraction procedure.

If the Editorial Board failed to answer a retraction claim from the author within 10 days, the author is free to appeal to the Society of Science Editors and Publishers.

If the Editorial Board decides to retract the article based on the violations mentioned above, the corresponding author is sent a notification that explains the reasons for the retraction. The final decision takes into account the explanation given by the author. Should the author fail to respond within 10 days, the Editors are free to retract the publication without the author’s concern. Irrespective of the fact whether the authors accept the standpoint of the editorial board or not, the retraction is an abiding procedure.

The retraction protocol is sent to the corresponding author, the Society of Science Editors and Publishers, eLIBRARY.RU, and CUBERLENINKA e-libraries. A retraction note, which states its reason and date, is published both in paper and online versions of the Journal. After that, the article will be marked as RETRACTED in all reference databases. Retracted articles are excluded from all citation indices and reference lists and do not affect electronic calculations of one’s personal scientific achievements.

After the retraction procedure has been completed, the Editorial Board retains the right not to accept other manuscripts submitted by the author(s) in question for a certain period.

The printed version of the journal "Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences" is distributed through a subscription in the catalog "Press of Russia" (subscription index – 94232).

You can purchase individual issues of the printed version of the journal «Bulletin of Kemerovo State University» through noncash settlement:

For legal entities it is necessary to send an order in the official form to the editorial office via e-mail, specifying:

• issue number and year of issue of the journal,
• quantity (number of copies),
• organization's requisites for billings,
• corresponding person.

For private persons: you can buy the issue of the journal by paying at any bank according to the details. It is necessary to make sure that the issue you need is available in the editorial office.
The paid-off issues may be collected at the editorial office of the journal at the address: 650000, Russia, Kemerovo, Sovetskii ave. 73, 125.

The mail delivery is also possible to the regions and Countries (after paying), for which it's necessary to give the address with Zip code for sending an issue of the journal.

The cost of one copy – ₽ 750 excluding shipping, ₽ 950. – with shipment in Russia.

Pay online  (!) How to make a payment

4 times a year