Обложка журнала
Journal title (English)
BULLETIN OF KEMEROVO STATE UNIVERSITY. SERIES: HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
Language of publication
Russian, English
ISSN
2542-1840 (print) 2541-9145 (online)
Periodicity (English)

4 times a year

The journal is included in Russian science citation index?
Yes 64190

The structure of the article:

  1. Universal Decimal Classification Index (UDC).
  2. Article title.
  3. Initials and surname of the author (s).
  4. Abstract.
  5. Keywords.
  6. The text of the article with tables, figures, formulas.
  7. References.
  8. Information about the author (s): surname, name, patronymic; academic degree; academic title; position, place of work; telephone, e-mail address (e-mail), a unique number of the scientist (ORCID).
Requirements for the design of articles
  1. The text is typed without formatting and page numbering, taking into account paragraphs and special instructions in the requirements for the design of articles. The recommended size of the original article is 35–40 thousand characters, the overview one is more than 40 thousand characters including annotation, keywords and references.The title of the article (maximum length 10–12 words). Available in Russian and English.
  2. The initials and surname of the author (s) - separated by commas. Place of work and address of the organization. Available in Russian and English.
  3. The article should be annotated in Russian and English. The recommended volume is 150250 words. Annotation to the article should be: informative (not contain common words); original; content (reflect the main content of the article and the results of research); structured (follow the logic of describing the results in the article); compact. The abstract should include the following aspects of the content of the article: subject, purpose of work; method or methodology of the work; work results; scope of results; findings.
  4. The article should be supplied with keywords in Russian and English (the recommended number of keywords is 6–10).
  5. The full text is structured and divided into segmented headings: an introduction, methods and materials, results, conclusion.
  6. Graphs, charts, diagrams, drawings drawn by MS Office are provided in separate files in the format of source applications (.xls, .vsd, .doc)
  7. Un-drawn objects (scanned images, photographs) are provided as separate files in graphic formats (.tif, .jpg or .png) with a resolution of> 300 dpi.
  8. Tables are provided as editable text, not as images.
  9. References include only sources used in the preparation of the article. References to the cited literature are given in square brackets. For the Original scientific article, the recommended number of links is 25–40, for a review article - from 80 links.
  10. References are placed after the text of the article, numbered (starting with the first number) in the order of mention in the text, preceded by the word "Literature". Under one number it is permissible to indicate only one source.
  11. It is allowed to cite any primary sources, BUT references to such materials as: unpublished works; State documents (government decrees, laws, etc.), historical documents, newspaper articles, Internet sources without authorship (forums, blogs, etc.) should be placed in subscripts.
  12. Dictionaries, artistic, journalistic and other sources are not included in the list of references, but are indicated separately.
  13. Links to Internet resources are allowed subject to the rules for describing online electronic publications.
  14. It is desirable to limit self-citations to 10% of references from the total number of sources.
  15. The description of sources is made in accordance with GOST 7.05 “Bibliography link. General requirements and rules of drafting.
  16. The list of references in the transliteration is preceded by the word References, given in a completely separate block. Sources in foreign languages ​​are transferred to the References list without changes, all Russian-language sources in the list of references should be presented in the Romanesque alphabet (in Latin).
  17. The last page of the article contains information about the authors in Russian and English: the full name of the institution where the study was performed; full names of the authors; academic degree, title, position, place of work, contact telephone numbers, e-mail address of all authors.
  18. The sequence of design elements - in accordance with the structure of the article.

 

  1. Application for publication of an article
  2. Instruction for the design of the manuscript with recommendations.
  3. Instruction for registration profile ORCID.
  4. Retraction policy
  5. The procedure for sending, reviewing and admitting a manuscript to publication.
  6. Examples of the description of the cited publications.
  7. Systems of text translation into Latin TranslitterationTranslit!
  8. Systems of automatic generation of bibliographic description: BibmeCitefastCitation Creatio

Compliance requirements of publication ethics apply to all members of the publishing process – authors, editors, reviewers, and the publisher of the journal. The editorial board monitors compliance with the ethics requirements based on the manuals prepared by specialized organizations, and publishers, as well as the Association of Science Editors and Publishers (ASEP). The main standards relied on by the journal Bulletin of Kemerovo State University are those developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (United Kingdom), by the publisher Elsevier (Netherlands), and the Declaration "Ethical Principles of Scientific Publications" (adopted by ASEP). 

The responsibility of editors

  1. The editors are personally and independently responsible for the content of the materials published.
  2. The editors make fair and objective decisions, regardless of any commercial interest and provide a fair and efficient process for the independent review.
  3. The editors evaluate manuscripts' intellectual content, adhering to the principle of equality of Authors.
  4. The editors do not work with articles for which they have a conflict of interest.
  5. The editors resolve conflict situations arising during the editorial process.
  6. The editors of the journal publish information concerning corrections, rebuttals, and review articles in case the need arises.
  7. The editors do publish the final version of the article  only after agreement with the authors.
  8. The editors correctly conduct correspondence with authors and reviewers, timely respond to letters.

The responsibility of the reviewers

  1. The reviewer evaluates his or her own availability before the examination of the manuscript and accepts materials for review only if the reviewer is able to allow for sufficient time as to ensure the quality his or her work.
  2. The reviewer notifies the editorial staff of any conflict of interest (if one exists) before the start of the review of the article.
  3. The reviewer does not send information about the article and or any of the data contained within the article to any third party, and does not use the information obtained from the article for any personal and or commercial purposes.
  4. The reviewer draws conclusions about the quality of the article based on objective data, without expressing a personal relationship to the author.
  5. The reviewer uses only proper and appropriate language and explanations in respect to the articles, avoiding any personal remarks.
  6. The reviewer correctly conduct correspondence with editors, timely respond to letters.

The responsibility of the authors

  1. The author is responsible for the accuracy of the data presented in the article, and guarantees the originality of its content.
  2. The author notifies the editors if the article is based on previously published materials.
  3. The author does not submit the same article to different journals for review.
  4. All co-authors consent to the submission of their articles to the journal.
  5. The author informs the editorial staff of a potential conflict of interest.
  6. The author correctly cites his or her previous works and others' works, avoids self-plagiarism and an artificial increase in the volume of publications.
  7. The list of authors included only individuals who have made significant contributions to the research.
  8. If necessary, the authors either adjust the data presented in the article, or refute them.
  9. The author, who is acting as the contact with journal, informs all other co-authors of all changes and suggestions from the editorial staff, and does not make decisions regarding the article alone without the written consent of all co-authors.
  10. The author correctly conduct correspondence with editors, timely respond to letters.

The responsibility of the publisher

  1. Publisher supports scientific communications, finances this process, is responsible for adhering to the principles and procedures that contribute to the ethical duties of all participants in the editorial and publishing process.
  2. The publisher does not affect the editorial policy of the journal.
  3. The publisher provides legal support to the journal if necessary.
  4. The publisher provides for the timely release of next issues of the journal.

1. Manuscript submission

  1. You can sends a set of files: 1) application for publication; 2) the text of the article; 3) additional materials (figures, tables) by e-mail or upload to your personal account on the journal website.
  2. Please, let us know in your cover letter if you have already tried to submit your paper to another journal but it was not accepted. Otherwise you might be mistakenly suspected of plagiarism.
  3. Our editors neither discuss the manuscripts with their authors nor give advice on formatting, style, and content improvements.

2. Registration and initial check-up

  1. It seldom takes our team more than 5 days to register and check up a manuscript. You will be informed about the current status of your manuscript by e-mail. If no confirmation has arrived within 5 days, it might mean that there has been a mistake and we did not get your manuscript. In this case, please, contact us by calling +7(3842)581301 or sent us another e-mail.
  2. At the initial stage, the editor makes sure that your paper meets the following general and formatting requirements (see Manuscript guidelines):
  • the topic corresponds with one of the traditional sections of the journal;
  • publication ethics (the manuscript contains no plagiarism; the references are correct and accurate; the material has been previously unpublished in other journals);
  • format (wordage, structure, number of key words, the size of the abstract, the English version of the abstract, key words, etc., references, quotes, etc.)
  1. If your manuscript fails to meet the publication ethics or profile of the Bulletin, you will receive a substantiated letter of rejection.
  2. If your manuscript fails to meet the format requirements, you will be given 10 days to correct the mistakes. In case the improved version arrives later than that, it will have to go through the initial stage again.
  3. Should you have any difficulties while formatting your manuscript, please, consult our guidelines.

3. Peer review stage

  1. After your paper has successfully passed the initial check-up stage, it will have to undergo a double review. The reviewer reviews the manuscript without knowledge of the authors' names. Likewise, the author does not know the name of the reviewer. Correspondence between the author and the reviewer takes place via e-mail in the edition on the journal.
  2. Reviewers will be appointed by the editorial board. The peer review can be conducted by the members of the Editorial Board or by acknowledged academic specialists in the sphere.
  3. Reviewers follow the rules of publication ethics established by the editorial board.
  4. Appointed reviewers can refuse to analyze the manuscript in case there is a conflict of interest or if they cannot provide an unbiased review for some reason.
  5. Reviews (review sample) are written in free form; however, they clarify the following compulsory aspects:
  • Does the paper correspond with the profile of the journal?Is the topic relevant?
  • Does the paper possess any theoretical and practical significance?
  • Is the author’s approach novel?
  • Is the style scientific and clear?
  1. We will normally send you anonymous reviews of you paper within 21-60 days.
  2. The reviews contain one of the following recommendations:
  • publish the paper as it is;
  • publish the paper after it has been improved according to the recommendations of the reviewers if the author agrees to make such improvements;
  • publish the paper only after it has been improved according to the recommendations of the reviewers;
  • reject the manuscript with the right to resubmit it;
  • reject the manuscript with no future resubmission.
  1. Your manuscript might have to undergo an extra review if considered necessary.
  2. In case the editor e-mails you a list of suggested improvements, you can accept them or to give a substantiated refusal.
  3. Please e-mail your improved variant back to the editor within 30 days; otherwise your manuscript will have to start from square one.
  4. Your improved version has to be accompanied by a cover letter as a separate file (Name_answer) where you will have to respond to the criticism and explain all the improvements you have made in your paper (Name_paper_improved). Please highlight all the improvements in the text.
  5. If the reviews are negative, you will be sent a substantiated rejection letter signed by the chief editor or the deputy editor.
  6. In case of rejection, you may challenge our decision by sending a letter of appeal to the chief editor. In your letter, please, explain why your manuscript should be reconsidered. Enclose an improved version of your paper, if necessary. Please, mind that the decision made by the chief editor is final and cannot be challenged.
  7. The chief editor considers the final edited version of every paper, reviews, and the author’s response and makes the final decision (approved / returned to the author for further revision / rejected). After that, the editor will inform you about the final decision of the chief editor within 10 days.
  8. Should you need a copy of the reviews, do not hesitate to send us your request. Mind that the copy will be anonymous.
  9. Copies of all reviews can be submitted to the Supreme Qualifying Committee upon request.
  10. Original reviews are stored in the editorial office for 5 years.
  11. In case the authors do not respond to the constructive feedback from the reviewers or the editor, the manuscript is likely to be rejected.

 ​​​​​​4. Publishing stage

  1. After your manuscript has been accepted for publishing, you will be sent a letter with the publishing date. We can send you a confirmation letter upon request.
  2. The publishing date depends on the registration date. However, research materials of high relevance can be given higher priority.
  3. If your paper has been accepted, it does not mean that it will be published in the next issue. The editorial board can change the order of priority without explanation, if necessary.

5. Retraction

  1. Retraction can be initiated by authors, readers, reviewers, editors, and other publishers by officially appealing to the Editorial Board. An expertise conducted by the Editorial Board can also trigger a retraction procedure (Retraction policy).
  1. After your paper has successfully passed the initial check-up stage, it will have to undergo a double review. The reviewer reviews the manuscript without knowledge of the authors' names. Likewise, the author does not know the name of the reviewer. Correspondence between the author and the reviewer takes place via e-mail in the edition on the journal.
  2. Reviewers will be appointed by the editorial board. The peer review can be conducted by the members of the Editorial Board or by acknowledged academic specialists in the sphere.
  3. Reviewers follow the rules of publication ethics established by the editorial board.
  4. Appointed reviewers can refuse to analyze the manuscript in case there is a conflict of interest or if they cannot provide an unbiased review for some reason.
  5. Reviews (review sample) are written in free form; however, they clarify the following compulsory aspects:
  • Does the paper correspond with the profile of the journal?Is the topic relevant?
  • Does the paper possess any theoretical and practical significance?
  • Is the author’s approach novel?
  • Is the style scientific and clear?
  1. We will normally send you anonymous reviews of you paper within 21-60 days.
  2. The reviews contain one of the following recommendations:
  • publish the paper as it is;
  • publish the paper after it has been improved according to the recommendations of the reviewers if the author agrees to make such improvements;
  • publish the paper only after it has been improved according to the recommendations of the reviewers;
  • reject the manuscript with the right to resubmit it;
  • reject the manuscript with no future resubmission.
  1. Your manuscript might have to undergo an extra review if considered necessary.
  2. In case the editor e-mails you a list of suggested improvements, you can accept them or to give a substantiated refusal.
  3. Please e-mail your improved variant back to the editor within 30 days; otherwise your manuscript will have to start from square one.
  4. Your improved version has to be accompanied by a cover letter as a separate file (Name_answer) where you will have to respond to the criticism and explain all the improvements you have made in your paper (Name_paper_improved). Please highlight all the improvements in the text.
  5. If the reviews are negative, you will be sent a substantiated rejection letter signed by the chief editor or the deputy editor.
  6. In case of rejection, you may challenge our decision by sending a letter of appeal to the chief editor. In your letter, please, explain why your manuscript should be reconsidered. Enclose an improved version of your paper, if necessary. Please, mind that the decision made by the chief editor is final and cannot be challenged.
  7. The chief editor considers the final edited version of every paper, reviews, and the author’s response and makes the final decision (approved / returned to the author for further revision / rejected). After that, the editor will inform you about the final decision of the chief editor within 10 days.
  8. Should you need a copy of the reviews, do not hesitate to send us your request. Mind that the copy will be anonymous.
  9. Copies of all reviews can be submitted to the Supreme Qualifying Committee upon request.
  10. Original reviews are stored in the editorial office for 5 years.
  11. In case the authors do not respond to the constructive feedback from the reviewers or the editor, the manuscript is likely to be rejected.

The Editors of the Bulletin of Kemerovo State University adhere to the following retraction policy:

The editors can retract a published article to inform the readers that the article contains faulty / unreliable data, plagiarisms, an unreported conflict of interests, or doubling, i.e. if new information has been revealed that can affect the interpretation of the published data or recommendations on their use.

Therefore, an article can be retracted if the Editors found out that

  • the article violates the ethics of scientific publishing;
  • the author(s) published one and the same data or manuscript in several journals without a serious reason, authorization, or cross reference;
  • the bulk of the article was copied prom a previously published work by a different author;
  • if the article contains invalid data, be it the result of a deliberate violation, miscalculation, experimental error, or misprint.

Retraction can be initiated by authors, readers, reviewers, editors, and other publishers by officially appealing to the Editorial Board. An expertise conducted by the Editorial Board can also trigger a retraction procedure.

If the Editorial Board failed to answer a retraction claim from the author within 10 days, the author is free to appeal to the Society of Science Editors and Publishers.

If the Editorial Board decides to retract the article based on the violations mentioned above, the corresponding author is sent a notification that explains the reasons for the retraction. The final decision takes into account the explanation given by the author. Should the author fail to respond within 10 days, the Editors are free to retract the publication without the author’s concern. Irrespective of the fact whether the authors accept the standpoint of the editorial board or not, the retraction is an abiding procedure.

The retraction protocol is sent to the corresponding author, the Society of Science Editors and Publishers, eLIBRARY.RU, and CUBERLENINKA e-libraries. A retraction note, which states its reason and date, is published both in paper and online versions of the Journal. After that, the article will be marked as RETRACTED in all reference databases. Retracted articles are excluded from all citation indices and reference lists and do not affect electronic calculations of one’s personal scientific achievements.

After the retraction procedure has been completed, the Editorial Board retains the right not to accept other manuscripts submitted by the author(s) in question for a certain period.

Morozova Irina  — Chief editor
Kemerovo State University ( Institute of Education , Director )
employee
doctor of psychological sciences
professor
Kemerovo , Russian Federation
Bibilo Valentina  — Editorial board member
Belarusian State University
doctor of jurisprudence sciences
professor
Minsk , Belarus
Bobrikov Valeriy  — Editorial board member
Kuzbass State Technical University
doctor of pedagogical sciences
professor
Kemerovo , Russian Federation
Gritskov Yuriy  — Editorial board member
Siberian Federal University
doctor of philosophical sciences
professor
Krasnoyarsk , Russian Federation
Zheltov Viktor  — Editorial board member
Kemerovo State University
doctor of philosophical sciences
professor
Kemerovo , Russian Federation
Zhukova Olga  — Editorial board member
Kemerovo State University
employee
doctor of philosophical sciences
professor
Kemerovo , Russian Federation
Znikin Valeriy  — Editorial board member
Tomsk State University
employee
doctor of jurisprudence sciences
Academic rank
  1. Honored lawyer of Russia
professor
Tomsk , Russian Federation
Zolotukhin Vladimir  — Editorial board member
Kuzbass State Technical University
doctor of philosophical sciences
professor
Kemerovo , Russian Federation
Krasikov Vladimir  — Editorial board member
All-Russian State University of Justice (RLA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)
doctor of philosophical sciences
professor
Moskva , Russian Federation
Laskowska Katazyna  — Editorial board member
University of Białystok
doctor of jurisprudence sciences
professor
Belostok , Poland
Mardahaev Lev Vladimirovich  — Editorial board member
Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy social'nyy universitet ( kafedra social'noy pedagogiki i organizacii raboty s molodezh'yu fakul'teta social'noy raboty , professor )
doctor of pedagogical sciences
professor
Russian Federation
Moskovchenko Olga  — Editorial board member
V. P. Astafyev Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University
employee
doctor of pedagogical sciences
professor
Krasnoyarsk , Russian Federation
Nevzorov Boris  — Editorial board member
Kemerovo State University
candidate of physical and mathematical sciences from 01.01.1970 until now ,
doctor of pedagogical sciences from 01.01.1998 until now
Academic rank
  1. Laureate of the Government Prize in Education from 01.01.1998 until now
  2. Honored Worker of Higher School of the Russian Federation from 01.01.1999 until now
  3. Academician of the International Academy of Higher Education from 01.01.2001 until now
  4. Honored Worker of Science and Education of RAE from 01.01.2008 until now
professor
Kemerovo , Russian Federation
Osipova Svetlana  — Editorial board member
Siberian Federal University
employee
doctor of pedagogical sciences
professor
Krasnoyarsk , Russian Federation
Samovich Yuliya  — Editorial board member
Russian State University of Justice (Kazan branch)
employee
doctor of jurisprudence sciences
professor
Kazan' , Russian Federation
Khaliapina Lyudmila  — Editorial board member
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
employee
doctor of pedagogical sciences
professor
Sankt-Peterburg , Russian Federation
Chernenko Tamara  — Editorial board member
Kemerovo State University
employee
doctor of jurisprudence sciences
Academic rank
  1. Honored lawyer of Russia
professor
Kemerovo , Russian Federation
Chistyakova Svetlana  — Editorial board member
Russian Education Academy
employee
doctor of pedagogical sciences
professor ,
academician Russian Academy of Education
Moskva , Russian Federation
Churekova Tatiana  — Editorial board member
Kemerovo State Institute of Kulture
employee
doctor of pedagogical sciences
professor
Kemerovo , Russian Federation
Shepel Tamara  — Editorial board member
Novosibirsk State University ( department of civil law , head )
employee
doctor of jurisprudence sciences
professor
Novosibirsk , Russian Federation
Yashchuk Tatiana  — Editorial board member
Omsk State University named after F.M. Dostoevsky ( kafedra teorii i istorii gosudarstva i prava, prorektor po nauchnoy rabote , professor )
employee
doctor of jurisprudence sciences
professor
Omsk , Russian Federation
JURISPRUDENCE
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
INDEX OF ARTICLES
Publisher
Kemerovo State University
Founder
Kemerovo State University
The certificate of registration of the periodical (print)
ПИ № ФС 77 - 67379
Date of issue testifies to the registration of the newspaper (print)
05.10.2016

Scientific journal "Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series:  Humanities and Social Sciences" is peer-reviewed scientific journal published since 2017 with a frequency of 4 times a year.

The Bulletin is registered by The Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology, and Mass Media, Registration Certificate PI № FS 77 – 67379The International Standard Serial Issue (ISSN) of the Journal is 2542-1840 (print), 2541-9145 (online).

The journal publishes original scientific and review articles, reviews in the following areas: Pedagogical sciences (Theory and methods of professional education)Philosophical Sciences (Ontology and Theory of Knowledge; Social Philosophy; Philosophical Anthropology, Philosophy of Culture)Jurisprudence (Civil law, Business law, Family law, International private law;  Criminal law and criminology; Criminal procedure, criminalistics; operational search activity).

All articles submitted to the editor are subject to mandatory double-blind review. Reviewers will be appointed by the editorial board. The double blind peer review can be conducted by the members of the Editorial Board or by acknowledged academic specialists in the sphere.

"Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences" use native russian-language plagiarism detection software Antiplagiat to screen the submissions. If plagiarism is identified, the COPE guidelines on plagiarism will be followed.

The Journal provides direct open access to its content, based on the following principle: free open access to research results contributes to an increase in global knowledge sharing.  The electronic version of the journal is available for viewing on the site of the publication, on the platforms of the Scientific Electronic Library eLIBRARY.RU, the CyberLeninka Scientific Electronic Library and on the Lan system of the electronic library system. The journal is included included in the abstract database Russian Science Citation Index (RISC), European Reference Index for the Humanities and the Social Sciences (ERIH PLUS).

All articles included into journal “Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Political, Sociological and Economic sciences” are published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).

Each issue of the Bulletin should be certainly sent to the federal government agency for press, mass media and mass communications, to the Russian Central Institute of Bibliography, and to other leading libraries, educational and scientific institutions of the Russian Federation.

The Journal is financed by the Founder and does not charge authors for fees for reviewing, preparing a journal for printing, publishing, as well as for placing articles in Open Access and site content.

 Address of the Founder, Publisher: 6 Krasnaya St., Kemerovo, Kemerovo region, Russia, 650000; 8(3842)58-12-26; rector@kemsu.ru

Editorial Office Address: of. 2125, 6 Krasnaya St., Kemerovo, Kemerovo region, Russia, 650000

Contacts for co-operation:
Irina S. Morozova, Editor-in-Chief; ishmorozova@yandex.ru
Lyudmila  Starikova, Editor; vestnik@kemsu.ru
Nataliya Mitko, Editor; vs-seriya@yandex.ru

The structure of the article:

  1. Universal Decimal Classification Index (UDC).
  2. Article title.
  3. Initials and surname of the author (s).
  4. Abstract.
  5. Keywords.
  6. The text of the article with tables, figures, formulas.
  7. References.
  8. Information about the author (s): surname, name, patronymic; academic degree; academic title; position, place of work; telephone, e-mail address (e-mail), a unique number of the scientist (ORCID).
Requirements for the design of articles
  1. The text is typed without formatting and page numbering, taking into account paragraphs and special instructions in the requirements for the design of articles. The recommended size of the original article is 35–40 thousand characters, the overview one is more than 40 thousand characters including annotation, keywords and references.The title of the article (maximum length 10–12 words). Available in Russian and English.
  2. The initials and surname of the author (s) - separated by commas. Place of work and address of the organization. Available in Russian and English.
  3. The article should be annotated in Russian and English. The recommended volume is 150250 words. Annotation to the article should be: informative (not contain common words); original; content (reflect the main content of the article and the results of research); structured (follow the logic of describing the results in the article); compact. The abstract should include the following aspects of the content of the article: subject, purpose of work; method or methodology of the work; work results; scope of results; findings.
  4. The article should be supplied with keywords in Russian and English (the recommended number of keywords is 6–10).
  5. The full text is structured and divided into segmented headings: an introduction, methods and materials, results, conclusion.
  6. Graphs, charts, diagrams, drawings drawn by MS Office are provided in separate files in the format of source applications (.xls, .vsd, .doc)
  7. Un-drawn objects (scanned images, photographs) are provided as separate files in graphic formats (.tif, .jpg or .png) with a resolution of> 300 dpi.
  8. Tables are provided as editable text, not as images.
  9. References include only sources used in the preparation of the article. References to the cited literature are given in square brackets. For the Original scientific article, the recommended number of links is 25–40, for a review article - from 80 links.
  10. References are placed after the text of the article, numbered (starting with the first number) in the order of mention in the text, preceded by the word "Literature". Under one number it is permissible to indicate only one source.
  11. It is allowed to cite any primary sources, BUT references to such materials as: unpublished works; State documents (government decrees, laws, etc.), historical documents, newspaper articles, Internet sources without authorship (forums, blogs, etc.) should be placed in subscripts.
  12. Dictionaries, artistic, journalistic and other sources are not included in the list of references, but are indicated separately.
  13. Links to Internet resources are allowed subject to the rules for describing online electronic publications.
  14. It is desirable to limit self-citations to 10% of references from the total number of sources.
  15. The description of sources is made in accordance with GOST 7.05 “Bibliography link. General requirements and rules of drafting.
  16. The list of references in the transliteration is preceded by the word References, given in a completely separate block. Sources in foreign languages ​​are transferred to the References list without changes, all Russian-language sources in the list of references should be presented in the Romanesque alphabet (in Latin).
  17. The last page of the article contains information about the authors in Russian and English: the full name of the institution where the study was performed; full names of the authors; academic degree, title, position, place of work, contact telephone numbers, e-mail address of all authors.
  18. The sequence of design elements - in accordance with the structure of the article.

 

  1. Application for publication of an article
  2. Instruction for the design of the manuscript with recommendations.
  3. Instruction for registration profile ORCID.
  4. Retraction policy
  5. The procedure for sending, reviewing and admitting a manuscript to publication.
  6. Examples of the description of the cited publications.
  7. Systems of text translation into Latin TranslitterationTranslit!
  8. Systems of automatic generation of bibliographic description: BibmeCitefastCitation Creatio

Compliance requirements of publication ethics apply to all members of the publishing process – authors, editors, reviewers, and the publisher of the journal. The editorial board monitors compliance with the ethics requirements based on the manuals prepared by specialized organizations, and publishers, as well as the Association of Science Editors and Publishers (ASEP). The main standards relied on by the journal Bulletin of Kemerovo State University are those developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (United Kingdom), by the publisher Elsevier (Netherlands), and the Declaration "Ethical Principles of Scientific Publications" (adopted by ASEP). 

The responsibility of editors

  1. The editors are personally and independently responsible for the content of the materials published.
  2. The editors make fair and objective decisions, regardless of any commercial interest and provide a fair and efficient process for the independent review.
  3. The editors evaluate manuscripts' intellectual content, adhering to the principle of equality of Authors.
  4. The editors do not work with articles for which they have a conflict of interest.
  5. The editors resolve conflict situations arising during the editorial process.
  6. The editors of the journal publish information concerning corrections, rebuttals, and review articles in case the need arises.
  7. The editors do publish the final version of the article  only after agreement with the authors.
  8. The editors correctly conduct correspondence with authors and reviewers, timely respond to letters.

The responsibility of the reviewers

  1. The reviewer evaluates his or her own availability before the examination of the manuscript and accepts materials for review only if the reviewer is able to allow for sufficient time as to ensure the quality his or her work.
  2. The reviewer notifies the editorial staff of any conflict of interest (if one exists) before the start of the review of the article.
  3. The reviewer does not send information about the article and or any of the data contained within the article to any third party, and does not use the information obtained from the article for any personal and or commercial purposes.
  4. The reviewer draws conclusions about the quality of the article based on objective data, without expressing a personal relationship to the author.
  5. The reviewer uses only proper and appropriate language and explanations in respect to the articles, avoiding any personal remarks.
  6. The reviewer correctly conduct correspondence with editors, timely respond to letters.

The responsibility of the authors

  1. The author is responsible for the accuracy of the data presented in the article, and guarantees the originality of its content.
  2. The author notifies the editors if the article is based on previously published materials.
  3. The author does not submit the same article to different journals for review.
  4. All co-authors consent to the submission of their articles to the journal.
  5. The author informs the editorial staff of a potential conflict of interest.
  6. The author correctly cites his or her previous works and others' works, avoids self-plagiarism and an artificial increase in the volume of publications.
  7. The list of authors included only individuals who have made significant contributions to the research.
  8. If necessary, the authors either adjust the data presented in the article, or refute them.
  9. The author, who is acting as the contact with journal, informs all other co-authors of all changes and suggestions from the editorial staff, and does not make decisions regarding the article alone without the written consent of all co-authors.
  10. The author correctly conduct correspondence with editors, timely respond to letters.

The responsibility of the publisher

  1. Publisher supports scientific communications, finances this process, is responsible for adhering to the principles and procedures that contribute to the ethical duties of all participants in the editorial and publishing process.
  2. The publisher does not affect the editorial policy of the journal.
  3. The publisher provides legal support to the journal if necessary.
  4. The publisher provides for the timely release of next issues of the journal.

1. Manuscript submission

  1. You can sends a set of files: 1) application for publication; 2) the text of the article; 3) additional materials (figures, tables) by e-mail or upload to your personal account on the journal website.
  2. Please, let us know in your cover letter if you have already tried to submit your paper to another journal but it was not accepted. Otherwise you might be mistakenly suspected of plagiarism.
  3. Our editors neither discuss the manuscripts with their authors nor give advice on formatting, style, and content improvements.

2. Registration and initial check-up

  1. It seldom takes our team more than 5 days to register and check up a manuscript. You will be informed about the current status of your manuscript by e-mail. If no confirmation has arrived within 5 days, it might mean that there has been a mistake and we did not get your manuscript. In this case, please, contact us by calling +7(3842)581301 or sent us another e-mail.
  2. At the initial stage, the editor makes sure that your paper meets the following general and formatting requirements (see Manuscript guidelines):
  • the topic corresponds with one of the traditional sections of the journal;
  • publication ethics (the manuscript contains no plagiarism; the references are correct and accurate; the material has been previously unpublished in other journals);
  • format (wordage, structure, number of key words, the size of the abstract, the English version of the abstract, key words, etc., references, quotes, etc.)
  1. If your manuscript fails to meet the publication ethics or profile of the Bulletin, you will receive a substantiated letter of rejection.
  2. If your manuscript fails to meet the format requirements, you will be given 10 days to correct the mistakes. In case the improved version arrives later than that, it will have to go through the initial stage again.
  3. Should you have any difficulties while formatting your manuscript, please, consult our guidelines.

3. Peer review stage

  1. After your paper has successfully passed the initial check-up stage, it will have to undergo a double review. The reviewer reviews the manuscript without knowledge of the authors' names. Likewise, the author does not know the name of the reviewer. Correspondence between the author and the reviewer takes place via e-mail in the edition on the journal.
  2. Reviewers will be appointed by the editorial board. The peer review can be conducted by the members of the Editorial Board or by acknowledged academic specialists in the sphere.
  3. Reviewers follow the rules of publication ethics established by the editorial board.
  4. Appointed reviewers can refuse to analyze the manuscript in case there is a conflict of interest or if they cannot provide an unbiased review for some reason.
  5. Reviews (review sample) are written in free form; however, they clarify the following compulsory aspects:
  • Does the paper correspond with the profile of the journal?Is the topic relevant?
  • Does the paper possess any theoretical and practical significance?
  • Is the author’s approach novel?
  • Is the style scientific and clear?
  1. We will normally send you anonymous reviews of you paper within 21-60 days.
  2. The reviews contain one of the following recommendations:
  • publish the paper as it is;
  • publish the paper after it has been improved according to the recommendations of the reviewers if the author agrees to make such improvements;
  • publish the paper only after it has been improved according to the recommendations of the reviewers;
  • reject the manuscript with the right to resubmit it;
  • reject the manuscript with no future resubmission.
  1. Your manuscript might have to undergo an extra review if considered necessary.
  2. In case the editor e-mails you a list of suggested improvements, you can accept them or to give a substantiated refusal.
  3. Please e-mail your improved variant back to the editor within 30 days; otherwise your manuscript will have to start from square one.
  4. Your improved version has to be accompanied by a cover letter as a separate file (Name_answer) where you will have to respond to the criticism and explain all the improvements you have made in your paper (Name_paper_improved). Please highlight all the improvements in the text.
  5. If the reviews are negative, you will be sent a substantiated rejection letter signed by the chief editor or the deputy editor.
  6. In case of rejection, you may challenge our decision by sending a letter of appeal to the chief editor. In your letter, please, explain why your manuscript should be reconsidered. Enclose an improved version of your paper, if necessary. Please, mind that the decision made by the chief editor is final and cannot be challenged.
  7. The chief editor considers the final edited version of every paper, reviews, and the author’s response and makes the final decision (approved / returned to the author for further revision / rejected). After that, the editor will inform you about the final decision of the chief editor within 10 days.
  8. Should you need a copy of the reviews, do not hesitate to send us your request. Mind that the copy will be anonymous.
  9. Copies of all reviews can be submitted to the Supreme Qualifying Committee upon request.
  10. Original reviews are stored in the editorial office for 5 years.
  11. In case the authors do not respond to the constructive feedback from the reviewers or the editor, the manuscript is likely to be rejected.

 ​​​​​​4. Publishing stage

  1. After your manuscript has been accepted for publishing, you will be sent a letter with the publishing date. We can send you a confirmation letter upon request.
  2. The publishing date depends on the registration date. However, research materials of high relevance can be given higher priority.
  3. If your paper has been accepted, it does not mean that it will be published in the next issue. The editorial board can change the order of priority without explanation, if necessary.

5. Retraction

  1. Retraction can be initiated by authors, readers, reviewers, editors, and other publishers by officially appealing to the Editorial Board. An expertise conducted by the Editorial Board can also trigger a retraction procedure (Retraction policy).

The Journal is financed by the Founder and does not charge authors for fees for reviewing, preparing a journal for printing, publishing, as well as for placing articles in Open Access and site content.

  1. After your paper has successfully passed the initial check-up stage, it will have to undergo a double review. The reviewer reviews the manuscript without knowledge of the authors' names. Likewise, the author does not know the name of the reviewer. Correspondence between the author and the reviewer takes place via e-mail in the edition on the journal.
  2. Reviewers will be appointed by the editorial board. The peer review can be conducted by the members of the Editorial Board or by acknowledged academic specialists in the sphere.
  3. Reviewers follow the rules of publication ethics established by the editorial board.
  4. Appointed reviewers can refuse to analyze the manuscript in case there is a conflict of interest or if they cannot provide an unbiased review for some reason.
  5. Reviews (review sample) are written in free form; however, they clarify the following compulsory aspects:
  • Does the paper correspond with the profile of the journal?Is the topic relevant?
  • Does the paper possess any theoretical and practical significance?
  • Is the author’s approach novel?
  • Is the style scientific and clear?
  1. We will normally send you anonymous reviews of you paper within 21-60 days.
  2. The reviews contain one of the following recommendations:
  • publish the paper as it is;
  • publish the paper after it has been improved according to the recommendations of the reviewers if the author agrees to make such improvements;
  • publish the paper only after it has been improved according to the recommendations of the reviewers;
  • reject the manuscript with the right to resubmit it;
  • reject the manuscript with no future resubmission.
  1. Your manuscript might have to undergo an extra review if considered necessary.
  2. In case the editor e-mails you a list of suggested improvements, you can accept them or to give a substantiated refusal.
  3. Please e-mail your improved variant back to the editor within 30 days; otherwise your manuscript will have to start from square one.
  4. Your improved version has to be accompanied by a cover letter as a separate file (Name_answer) where you will have to respond to the criticism and explain all the improvements you have made in your paper (Name_paper_improved). Please highlight all the improvements in the text.
  5. If the reviews are negative, you will be sent a substantiated rejection letter signed by the chief editor or the deputy editor.
  6. In case of rejection, you may challenge our decision by sending a letter of appeal to the chief editor. In your letter, please, explain why your manuscript should be reconsidered. Enclose an improved version of your paper, if necessary. Please, mind that the decision made by the chief editor is final and cannot be challenged.
  7. The chief editor considers the final edited version of every paper, reviews, and the author’s response and makes the final decision (approved / returned to the author for further revision / rejected). After that, the editor will inform you about the final decision of the chief editor within 10 days.
  8. Should you need a copy of the reviews, do not hesitate to send us your request. Mind that the copy will be anonymous.
  9. Copies of all reviews can be submitted to the Supreme Qualifying Committee upon request.
  10. Original reviews are stored in the editorial office for 5 years.
  11. In case the authors do not respond to the constructive feedback from the reviewers or the editor, the manuscript is likely to be rejected.

The Editors of the Bulletin of Kemerovo State University adhere to the following retraction policy:

The editors can retract a published article to inform the readers that the article contains faulty / unreliable data, plagiarisms, an unreported conflict of interests, or doubling, i.e. if new information has been revealed that can affect the interpretation of the published data or recommendations on their use.

Therefore, an article can be retracted if the Editors found out that

  • the article violates the ethics of scientific publishing;
  • the author(s) published one and the same data or manuscript in several journals without a serious reason, authorization, or cross reference;
  • the bulk of the article was copied prom a previously published work by a different author;
  • if the article contains invalid data, be it the result of a deliberate violation, miscalculation, experimental error, or misprint.

Retraction can be initiated by authors, readers, reviewers, editors, and other publishers by officially appealing to the Editorial Board. An expertise conducted by the Editorial Board can also trigger a retraction procedure.

If the Editorial Board failed to answer a retraction claim from the author within 10 days, the author is free to appeal to the Society of Science Editors and Publishers.

If the Editorial Board decides to retract the article based on the violations mentioned above, the corresponding author is sent a notification that explains the reasons for the retraction. The final decision takes into account the explanation given by the author. Should the author fail to respond within 10 days, the Editors are free to retract the publication without the author’s concern. Irrespective of the fact whether the authors accept the standpoint of the editorial board or not, the retraction is an abiding procedure.

The retraction protocol is sent to the corresponding author, the Society of Science Editors and Publishers, eLIBRARY.RU, and CUBERLENINKA e-libraries. A retraction note, which states its reason and date, is published both in paper and online versions of the Journal. After that, the article will be marked as RETRACTED in all reference databases. Retracted articles are excluded from all citation indices and reference lists and do not affect electronic calculations of one’s personal scientific achievements.

After the retraction procedure has been completed, the Editorial Board retains the right not to accept other manuscripts submitted by the author(s) in question for a certain period.

The printed version of the journal "Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences" is distributed through a subscription in the catalog "Press of Russia" (subscription index – 94232).

You can purchase individual issues of the printed version of the journal «Bulletin of Kemerovo State University» through noncash settlement:

For legal entities it is necessary to send an order in the official form to the editorial office via e-mail, specifying:

  • issue number and year of issue of the journal,
  • quantity (number of copies),
  • organization's requisites for billings,
  • corresponding person.

For private persons: one can buy the chosen issue of " Bulletin of Kemerovo State University ", having paid off the receipt in any bank. It is necessary to make sure that the issue you need is available in the editorial office.
The paid off issues may be collected at the editorial office of the journal at the address: 650000, Russia, Kemerovo, Sovetskii ave. 73, 125.

The mail delivery is also possible to the regions and Countries (after paying off the receipt and the in-payment being completed), for which it is necessary to give the exact address with Zip code to send a copy of the journal to.

The cost of one copy – ₽ 750 excluding shipping, ₽ 950. – with shipment in Russia.

Download the receipt form
Pay online  
(!) How to make a payment

4 times a year

                        Abakumova Е. В.
Abakumova Е. В. Novosibirsk Military Institute of the Internal Troops named after Gen. I. K. Yakovlev; Siberian Institute of Management, branch of The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration; Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
                        Abakumova Ekaterina
Abakumova Ekaterina Novosibirsk Military Institute of the Internal Troops named after Gen. I. K. Yakovlev
Novosibirsk , Russian Federation
                        Aksenova A. A.
Aksenova A. A. Kemerovo State University
                        Aksenova A. N.
Aksenova A. N. Kuzbass Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of the Russian Federation
                        Almazova Nadezhda
Almazova Nadezhda Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
St. Petersburg , Russian Federation
                        Artyukhova T.
Artyukhova T. Siberian Federal University ( Department of Developmental Psychology and Counseling , Associate Professor )
employee
candidate of psychological sciences
docent
Russian Federation
                        Atayaksheva Irina
Atayaksheva Irina Secondary school № 26 in Novokuznetsk, 36
Kemerovo , Russian Federation
                        Bakirova A. M.
Bakirova A. M. Peoples Friendship University of Russia
                        Balabanov Pavel
Balabanov Pavel Kemerovo state Institute of culture
employee
Kemerovo , Russian Federation
                        Balashova Tatiana A.
Balashova Tatiana A. T. F. Gorbachev Kuzbass State Technical University
                        Balayan Ellada Yu.
Balayan Ellada Yu. Kemerovo State University
                        Belogai Ksenia
Belogai Ksenia Kemerovo State University
employee
                        Belyaev Maxim
Belyaev Maxim Kazan branch of the Russian state University of Justice ( kafedra ugolovno-pravovyh disciplin , professor )
employee
candidate of jurisprudence sciences
Kazan' , Russian Federation
                        Belyaeva Maria V.
Belyaeva Maria V. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University; Novosibirsk City Pedagogical Lyceum named after A. S. Pushkin
                        Berillo N. S.
Berillo N. S. Novosibirsk State National Research University
                        Bikmetov Rashit
Bikmetov Rashit Kuzbass State Technical University
Kemerovo , Russian Federation
                        Biljuchenko Galina
Biljuchenko Galina Kuzbuss State Technical University named after T.F. Gorbachev
employee
Kemerovo , Russian Federation
                        Birukova A. S.
Birukova A. S. Kemerovo State University
                        Bischler Ekaterina V.
Bischler Ekaterina V. Kemerovo State University (Novokuznetsk branch)
                        Bogolyubov E. A.
Bogolyubov E. A. Kemerovo State University
Morozova Irina  — Chief editor
Kemerovo State University ( Institute of Education , Director )
employee
doctor of psychological sciences
professor
Kemerovo , Russian Federation
Bibilo Valentina  — Editorial board member
Belarusian State University
doctor of jurisprudence sciences
professor
Minsk , Belarus
Bobrikov Valeriy  — Editorial board member
Kuzbass State Technical University
doctor of pedagogical sciences
professor
Kemerovo , Russian Federation
Gritskov Yuriy  — Editorial board member
Siberian Federal University
doctor of philosophical sciences
professor
Krasnoyarsk , Russian Federation
Zheltov Viktor  — Editorial board member
Kemerovo State University
doctor of philosophical sciences
professor
Kemerovo , Russian Federation
Zhukova Olga  — Editorial board member
Kemerovo State University
employee
doctor of philosophical sciences
professor
Kemerovo , Russian Federation
Znikin Valeriy  — Editorial board member
Tomsk State University
employee
doctor of jurisprudence sciences
Academic rank
  1. Honored lawyer of Russia
professor
Tomsk , Russian Federation
Zolotukhin Vladimir  — Editorial board member
Kuzbass State Technical University
doctor of philosophical sciences
professor
Kemerovo , Russian Federation
Krasikov Vladimir  — Editorial board member
All-Russian State University of Justice (RLA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)
doctor of philosophical sciences
professor
Moskva , Russian Federation
Laskowska Katazyna  — Editorial board member
University of Białystok
doctor of jurisprudence sciences
professor
Belostok , Poland
Mardahaev Lev Vladimirovich  — Editorial board member
Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy social'nyy universitet ( kafedra social'noy pedagogiki i organizacii raboty s molodezh'yu fakul'teta social'noy raboty , professor )
doctor of pedagogical sciences
professor
Russian Federation
Moskovchenko Olga  — Editorial board member
V. P. Astafyev Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University
employee
doctor of pedagogical sciences
professor
Krasnoyarsk , Russian Federation
Nevzorov Boris  — Editorial board member
Kemerovo State University
candidate of physical and mathematical sciences from 01.01.1970 until now ,
doctor of pedagogical sciences from 01.01.1998 until now
Academic rank
  1. Laureate of the Government Prize in Education from 01.01.1998 until now
  2. Honored Worker of Higher School of the Russian Federation from 01.01.1999 until now
  3. Academician of the International Academy of Higher Education from 01.01.2001 until now
  4. Honored Worker of Science and Education of RAE from 01.01.2008 until now
professor
Kemerovo , Russian Federation
Osipova Svetlana  — Editorial board member
Siberian Federal University
employee
doctor of pedagogical sciences
professor
Krasnoyarsk , Russian Federation
Samovich Yuliya  — Editorial board member
Russian State University of Justice (Kazan branch)
employee
doctor of jurisprudence sciences
professor
Kazan' , Russian Federation
Khaliapina Lyudmila  — Editorial board member
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
employee
doctor of pedagogical sciences
professor
Sankt-Peterburg , Russian Federation
Chernenko Tamara  — Editorial board member
Kemerovo State University
employee
doctor of jurisprudence sciences
Academic rank
  1. Honored lawyer of Russia
professor
Kemerovo , Russian Federation
Chistyakova Svetlana  — Editorial board member
Russian Education Academy
employee
doctor of pedagogical sciences
professor ,
academician Russian Academy of Education
Moskva , Russian Federation
Churekova Tatiana  — Editorial board member
Kemerovo State Institute of Kulture
employee
doctor of pedagogical sciences
professor
Kemerovo , Russian Federation
Shepel Tamara  — Editorial board member
Novosibirsk State University ( department of civil law , head )
employee
doctor of jurisprudence sciences
professor
Novosibirsk , Russian Federation
Yashchuk Tatiana  — Editorial board member
Omsk State University named after F.M. Dostoevsky ( kafedra teorii i istorii gosudarstva i prava, prorektor po nauchnoy rabote , professor )
employee
doctor of jurisprudence sciences
professor
Omsk , Russian Federation

Journal's mission

Scientific journal "Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series:  Humanities and Social Sciences" is peer-reviewed scientific journal published since 2017 with a frequency of 4 times a year.

The Bulletin is registered by The Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology, and Mass Media, Registration Certificate PI № FS 77 – 67379The International Standard Serial Issue (ISSN) of the Journal is 2542-1840 (print), 2541-9145 (online).

The journal publishes original scientific and review articles, reviews in the following areas: Pedagogical sciences (Theory and methods of professional education)Philosophical Sciences (Ontology and Theory of Knowledge; Social Philosophy; Philosophical Anthropology, Philosophy of Culture)Jurisprudence (Civil law, Business law, Family law, International private law;  Criminal law and criminology; Criminal procedure, criminalistics; operational search activity).

All articles submitted to the editor are subject to mandatory double-blind review. Reviewers will be appointed by the editorial board. The double blind peer review can be conducted by the members of the Editorial Board or by acknowledged academic specialists in the sphere.

"Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences" use native russian-language plagiarism detection software Antiplagiat to screen the submissions. If plagiarism is identified, the COPE guidelines on plagiarism will be followed.

The Journal provides direct open access to its content, based on the following principle: free open access to research results contributes to an increase in global knowledge sharing.  The electronic version of the journal is available for viewing on the site of the publication, on the platforms of the Scientific Electronic Library eLIBRARY.RU, the CyberLeninka Scientific Electronic Library and on the Lan system of the electronic library system. The journal is included included in the abstract database Russian Science Citation Index (RISC), European Reference Index for the Humanities and the Social Sciences (ERIH PLUS).

All articles included into journal “Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Political, Sociological and Economic sciences” are published and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).

Each issue of the Bulletin should be certainly sent to the federal government agency for press, mass media and mass communications, to the Russian Central Institute of Bibliography, and to other leading libraries, educational and scientific institutions of the Russian Federation.

The Journal is financed by the Founder and does not charge authors for fees for reviewing, preparing a journal for printing, publishing, as well as for placing articles in Open Access and site content.

 Address of the Founder, Publisher: 6 Krasnaya St., Kemerovo, Kemerovo region, Russia, 650000; 8(3842)58-12-26; rector@kemsu.ru

Editorial Office Address: of. 2125, 6 Krasnaya St., Kemerovo, Kemerovo region, Russia, 650000

Contacts for co-operation:
Irina S. Morozova, Editor-in-Chief; ishmorozova@yandex.ru
Lyudmila  Starikova, Editor; vestnik@kemsu.ru
Nataliya Mitko, Editor; vs-seriya@yandex.ru




Login or Create
* Forgot password?