"Nootheca": Point-Rating System + Design, or Revisiting the Issue of Transition from Quantitative to Qualitative Measurements of Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities

Nikolay D. Golev

doi:10.21603/2542-1840-2019-3-3-199-213

VAK Russia 13.00.08 UDC 37

2 more Collapse

"NOOTHECA": POINT-RATING SYSTEM + DESIGN, OR REVISITING THE ISSUE OF TRANSITION FROM QUANTITATIVE TO QUALITATIVE MEASUREMENTS OF KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, AND ABILITIES "Nootheca": Point-Rating System + Design, or Revisiting the Issue of Transition from Quantitative to Qualitative Measurements of Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities

АА Аа

Published in Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences · Volume 3, Issue 3 · Pages 199–213 · Rubric: PEDAGOGICS

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2019-3-3-199-213

Received: 11.12.2019 Accepted: 28.11.2025 Language of publication: RUS

Authors

Nikolay D. Golev

ORCID Scopus SPIN

Nikolay D. Golev

Academic degree: doctor of philological sciences

Science rang: professor

Kemerovo State University Russian Federation · Kemerovo

ORCID Scopus SPIN

ABSTRACT

The present paper introduces an authentic new-format point-rating system, the nootheca. It is based on the idea of a self-organizing educational process, where the quantitative measurement of the results acts as an incentive for collective and individual self-organization and organizes the educational process. The paper focuses on the components of nootheca, which form an integral didactic system. The system combines design and cumulative principles of classroom management. The author describes the technological aspects of the nootheca against a wider didactic context. This refers to both the theoretical context and the practice of constructing such systems, primarily the options they offer within the point-rating system. The research was not limited to the didactic aspect alone: it also included issues related to the measurement of quality in other areas of intellectual and cultural activity. In some cases, the study touched upon methodology and philosophy of education. As for the latter, the problems discussed are organically included in the general antinomies, e.g. quality vs. quantity as philosophical categories; part vs. whole; single / special vs. universal, etc. The specific didactic antinomies include the following antinomies: personality-oriented vs. team-oriented learning, knowledge-centered approach vs. skill-centered approach, etc. The antinomies form specific oppositions that are directly related to the topic of nootheca: online vs. offline classes, horizontal vs. vertical peer review, individual vs. group motivation, etc.

KEYWORDS

self-organization of the educational process, the Bell-Lancaster system, personal trajectory, didactic perlocution, horizontal peer review, synergetic microdots

Text

Text (PDF)

Read Download

1. Golev N. D. Morphology of the modern Russian language. Kemerovo: KemGU, 2006, 208. (In Russ.)

2. Imanova O. A., Starodubtseva A. E. Features of the self-organization of educational activities of students. Modern education: topical issues, achievements and innovations: Proc. XV Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Penza, March 25, 2018. Penza: Nauka i Prosveshchenie, 2018, p. 1, 50-52. (In Russ.)

3. Tsukerman G. A. He who teaches, also learns (mutual learning: opportunities and limits). Pedagogicheskii vestnik, 1997, (3): 46-51. (In Russ.)

4. Kovaleva T. M., Yakubovskaya T. V. Tyutorial activity as anthropopractice: between individual educational trajectories and individual educational programs. Chelovek.RU, 2017, (12): 85-94. (In Russ.)

5. Glushkova V. A. Bell-Lancaster education system in chemical education. Actual problems of chemical and environmental education: Proc. 64 All-Russian Sci.-Prac. Conf. of Chemists with Intern. participation, St. Petersburg, April 13-15, 2017. St. Petersburg: RGPU im. A. I. Gertsena, 2017, 60-64. (In Russ.)

6. Koroleva I. S. Literacy in the digital economy of the Bell-Lancaster system, or Bookshelves and "clouds" to help digital cultural commentators. Bibliotechnoe delo, 2019, (3): 16-19. (In Russ.)

7. Topchii D. V. The Bell-Lancaster peer education system: examples of application in modern schools. Pedagogical and psychological problems of modern education: Proc. Sci.-Prac. Conf. "Ushinsky Readings", Yaroslavl, March 4-5, 2015. Yaroslavl: RIO IaGPU, 2015, p. 1, 461-469. (In Russ.)

8. Bukalova N. P., Bukalova A. Iu. Application negentropy approach by controlling the level of professional training of students. Applied Mathematics and Control Sciences, 2015, (1): 103-113. (In Russ.)

9. Krasikova T. I. Information environment and development of the digital economy as a basis for the formation of a synergetic approach in teaching foreign languages. Actual problems of modern society and their solutions in the transition to a digital economy: Proc. XIV Intern. Sci. Conf., Moscow, April 5, 2018. Moscow: MUIV, 2018, 394-402. (In Russ.)

10. Lamzin S. A. Synergetic and virtual reality as modern concepts for the development of linguadidactics. Evraziiskii Soiuz Uchenykh, 2015, (7-4): 68-70. (In Russ.)

11. Tsvetkov V. Ya. Synergetics education and points of innovation and growth. Upravlenie obrazovaniem: teoriia i praktika, 2013, (2): 19-24. (In Russ.)

12. Sologub O. P. The linguadidactic potential of Facebook and its use in practice for teaching Russian as a foreign language. Interface: Journal of European Languages and Literatures, 2018, (6): 67-92. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.6667/interface.6.2018.63

13. Sologub O. P. On-line correspondence as self-teaching. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2016, (3): 180-186. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2016-3-180-186

14. Kalugin Iu. E. Self-education. Formation of readiness for professional self-education. Chelyabinsk: Izd-vo Iuzh.-Ural. gos. un-ta, 2000, 119. (In Russ.)

15. Kontsevich G. E. Self-education is a necessary condition for the adaptation of personnel in the transitive economy of the Russian Federation: group and individual motivation for professional knowledge. Humanitarian knowledge and spiritual security: Proc. III Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Grozny, December 1-3, 2016. Grozny: ChGPU, 2016, 197-205. (In Russ.)

16. Gorbachev V. I., Gorbachev S. V. Teaching resuscitation skills in postgraduate education of doctors in the aspect of the Bell-Lancaster system. Innovatsii v obrazovanii, 2016, (3): 16-21. (In Russ.)

17. Vdovina S. A., Kungurova I. M. The nature and directions of the individual educational trajectory. Internet-zhurnal "Naukovedenie", 2013, (6). Available at: https://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/40PVN613.pdf (accessed 15.09.2019). (In Russ.)

18. Mukhametzyanova F. G., Zabirov R. V., Vafina V. R. The individual educational trajectory and the individual educational route of the student as a factor in the successful training of Bachelors at university. Modernization of education: problems and prospects: Proc. XXII Ryazan pedagogical readings, Ryazan, March 20, 2015. Ryazan: RGU im. S. A. Esenina, 2015, 81-85. (In Russ.)

19. Ogorodnova O. V., Kukuev Ye. A. Model of the educational module of an individual educational trajectory of the student of the university. The Emissia. Offline Letters, 2018, (9). Available at: http://emissia.org/offline/2018/2651.htm (accessed 15.09.2019). (In Russ.)

20. Peretyagina N. N. Individual educational trajectory as a way to save a person in the educational process. Psikhologiia obucheniia, 2010, (4): 15-27. (In Russ.)

21. Shemanaeva M. A. Individual learning path as synergy of synchronous and asynchronous learning. Jazyk i kul'tura, 2017, (39): 283-297. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.17223/19996195/39/20

22. Garmonnikov I. S. Features of the application of motivation methods in the framework of personal, group and corporate motivation. Novaia nauka: Strategii i vektory razvitiia, 2015, (6-1): 81-84. (In Russ.)

23. Chebotarev V. V., Chebotareva N. V. The point-rating system: pros and cons. Relevant issues of dermatovenereology, cosmetology and balneology: Proc. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Stavropol, February 28 - March 1, 2013. Stavropol: StGMU, 2014, 233-236. (In Russ.)

24. Gorbachev S. V., Gorbachev V. I. Bell-Lancaster resuscitation skills training system for postgraduate education. Vestnik intensivnoj terapii, 2015, (3): 9-10. (In Russ.)

25. Shvetsova V. A., Pchelkina E. P. Synergetic approach to training students in the system of higher professional education. Historical and Social-Educational Ideas, 2017, 9(3-1): 192-196. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.17748/2075-9908-2017-9-3/1-192-196

26. Zhulanova V. P., Vostrikova E. A., Fomichev R. S. Tutor Support as a Mechanism for Informational and Communicative Competence Formation in Teachers in the Process of Continuous Education. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki, 2018, (2): 11-19. (In Russ.)

27. Shatalov V. F. Where and how C grades disappeared. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1979, 134. (In Russ.)

28. Shatalov V. F. Experiment continues. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1989, 334. (In Russ.)

29. Golev N. D. Nootheca as a form of didactic communication: a competence-activity approach in the light of the requirements of third-generation programs in higher philological education. Communicativism in the modern world: efficiency and optimization of speech interaction in society: Proc. Third Intern. Sci. Conf., Barnaul, April 24-29, 2012. Barnaul: AltGU, 2012, 283-286. (In Russ.)

30. Golev N. D. Electronic nootheca as a new form of organization of the educational process and independent work of students. Problems of modernization of education in the context of Russia's entry into the Bologna process: Proc. XXVI Sci.-Method. Conf. of KemSU, Kemerovo, February 1-2, 2005. Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat, 2005, p. 2, 78-83. (In Russ.)

31. Golev N. D. E-mail correspondence as strategy and tactics of teaching foreign languages (linguodidactic project). Jazyk i kul'tura, 2015, (2): 105-116. (In Russ.)

32. Golev N. D., Sologub O. P. Online correspondence as linguadidactic project (the case of online communication in the practice of foreign language teaching). Natural written russian speech: research and educational aspects, ed. Rabenko T. G. Kemerovo: KemGU, 2016, pt. V, 17-33. (In Russ.)

33. Smirnova Z. V., Vaganova O. I. Corresponding training in the university through electron-educational environment. Innovatsionnaia ekonomika: perspektivy razvitiia i sovershenstvovaniia, 2019, (3): 111-118. (In Russ.)

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

PDF JATS XML

Chief editor

Irina Morozova

ishmorozova@yandex.ru

Deputy Editor-in-Chief

Egor Trezubov

egortrezubov@mail.ru

10272

downloads

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Creative Commons

GOST

Golev N. D. "Nootheca": Point-Rating System + Design, or Revisiting the Issue of Transition from Quantitative to Qualitative Measurements of Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities // Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences. 2019. no. 3. pp. 199-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2019-3-3-199-213. (Date of access 07.10.2026).

MLA

Nikolay D. Golev. ""Nootheca": Point-Rating System + Design, or Revisiting the Issue of Transition from Quantitative to Qualitative Measurements of Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities." Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences 3.3 (2019): 199-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2019-3-3-199-213.

APA

Golev N. D. (2019). "Nootheca": Point-Rating System + Design, or Revisiting the Issue of Transition from Quantitative to Qualitative Measurements of Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(3), 199-213. https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2019-3-3-199-213

Chicago

Nikolay D. Golev. ""Nootheca": Point-Rating System + Design, or Revisiting the Issue of Transition from Quantitative to Qualitative Measurements of Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities." Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences 3, no. 3 (2019): 199-213. https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2019-3-3-199-213.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Golev N. D. | title = "Nootheca": Point-Rating System + Design, or Revisiting the Issue of Transition from Quantitative to Qualitative Measurements of Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities | journal = Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences | year = 2019 | volume = 3 | issue = 3 | pages = 199-213 | doi = 10.21603/2542-1840-2019-3-3-199-213 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

Confirmation