Key Elements of Technological Independence Strategy in Russian Mechanical Engineering

Valeriya Krayushkina; Maria Varenik

doi:10.21603/2782-2435-2024-4-4-481-498

UDC

VAK Russia

5.2.3

KEY ELEMENTS OF TECHNOLOGICAL INDEPENDENCE STRATEGY IN RUSSIAN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING Key Elements of Technological Independence Strategy in Russian Mechanical Engineering

АА Аа

Published in Strategizing: Theory and Practice · Pages 481–498 · Rubric: Sectoral, Industrial, and Corporate Strategizing

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-2435-2024-4-4-481-498

Received: 14.10.2024 Accepted: 29.10.2024 Published: 11.11.2024 Language of publication: RUS

Authors

Valeriya Krayushkina

ORCID

Maria Varenik

ORCID

Valeriya Krayushkina

Russian Federation

ORCID

Maria Varenik

Lomonosov Moscow State University Russian Federation · Moscow

ORCID

ABSTRACT

The article describes the strategizing prospects for Russia’s technological sovereignty in the sphere of mechanical engineering. The authors used the methodology of strategizing developed by Professor V. L. Kvint to identify the problem field of industrial development and design an OTSW matrix of strategic analysis. The approach made it possible to define the key priorities in the strategic management system to ensure Russia’s technological independence in mechanical engineering. First, production and academia should unite to solve the problem of qualifications and competencies. Second, digital technologies are to form a consolidating system of digital management of technology development and implementation. The system will provide knowledge management, platform solutions, and expert-machine decision support. Eventually, it will diversify the tools of technological development and implementation, thus leading to public-private partnerships, strategic cooperation, and foreign investments that will fund further R&D projects. These priorities are comprehensive elements in the strategy for ensuring the technological independence of mechanical engineering in Russia. They are bound for success on the way to help the domestic mechanical engineering to cope with the current economic challenges.

KEYWORDS

strategizing, technological sovereignty, mechanical engineering, theory of strategizing by V. L. Kvint

1. Alabina TA. The Role of the Concept of Strategizing by V.L. Kvint in Economic Research of Strategies and its Features. Administrative Consulting. 2021;(9):45–57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-9-45-57

2. Vinokurov EY, Grichik MV. New concept of international reserve assets: Security, diversification and nonconventional approaches. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2022;(12):24–43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-12-24-43

3. Grinev SA, Kvint VL. Formation of strategic priorities of industrial development of the Russian Federation as an innovative factor in overcoming crisis periods. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2023;16(3):275–283. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2023-3-275-283

4. Kvint VL. Methodological Aspects of Developing Medial Strategies. Problems and Prospects for Industrial Development in Russia: Proceedings of VIII International Scientific and Practical Conference in Industrial Economics under Sanctions. Moscow: KnoRus; 2021. P. 190–192. https://www.elibrary.ru/REAMZU

5. Kvint VL, Babkin AV, Shkarupeta EV. Strategizing of forming a platform operating model to increase the level of digital maturity of industrial systems. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2022;15(3):249–261. https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2022-3-249-261

6. Kvint VL, Bodrunov SD. Strategic transformation of society: knowledge, technology, and noonomy. St. Petersburg: INIR after S. Yu. Vitte; 2021. 351 p. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/FKSHWL

7. Kvint VL, Novikova IV, Alimuradov MK. Alignment of Global and National Interest with Regional Strategic Priorities. Economics and Management. 2021;27(11):900–909. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2021-11-900-909

8. Kvint VL, Novikova IV, Alimuradov MK, Sasaev NI. Strategizing the National Economy during a Period of Burgeoning Technological Sovereignty. Administrative Consulting. 2022;(9):57–67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-9-57-67

9. Kvint VL, Fetisov VA, Alimuradov MK. The Fundamentals of Russia's Environmental Development Strategy. Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State University Publishing House; 2021. 77 p. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29003/m2447.978-5-19-011631-1

10. Kvint VL. The Concept of Strategizing. Vol 1. St. Petersburg: NWIM RANEPA, 2019. 132 p. (In Russ.)

11. Korovkin VV, Kuznetsova GV. Prospects for Digital Transformation in Russian Machine Building Industry. Ars Administrandi (The Art of Management). 2020;12(2):291–313. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-9173-2020-2-291-313

12. Okrepilov VV. The Role of The Economy of Quality in The Period of Innovative Transformation of Socio-Economic Development. Economic Revival of Russia. 2023;(2):33–41. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2023-2(76)-33-41

13. Okrepilov VV. Economics of Quality: The Most Important Direction in The Development of Economic Science. Problemy Prognozirovaniya. 2022;5:78–90. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47711/0868-6351-194-78-90

14. Saipova LHA, Ozdamirova LM, Jamaldinova MA. Research on the Application of Information Technology in Mechanical Engineering. Industrial Economics. 2023;(3):91–94 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.47576/2949-1886_2023_3_91

15. Sasaev NI. Fundamental basis for the formation of a new strategizing culture. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics. 2021;14(2):153–163. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2021-2-153-163

16. Shatskaya IV. Competitive advantages as an element of the strategy of an educational organization (based on the V.L. Kvint’s methodology). Journal of Modern Competition. 2021;15(4):127–139. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37791/2687-0649- 2021-15-4-127-139

17. Bhalla S, Alfnes E, Hvolby H-H. Tools and practices for tactical delivery date setting in engineer-to-order environments: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Research. 2023;61(7):2339–2371 https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2057256

18. Bhalla S, Alfnes E, Hvolby H-H. Oluyisola O. Sales and operations planning for delivery date setting in engineer-to-order manufacturing: a research synthesis and framework. International Journal of Production Research. 2023;61(21):7302–7332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2148010

19. Cannas VG, Gosling J. A decade of engineering-to-order (2010–2020): Progress and emerging themes. International journal of production economics. 2021;241:108274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108274

20. Fang J, Wei X. A knowledge support approach for the preliminary design of platform-based products in Engineering-To-Order manufacturing. Advanced Engineering Informatics. 2020;46:101196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101196

21. Kvint VL. Strategy for the Global Market: Theory and Practical Applications. New York: Routledge, 2015. 548 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315709314

22. Neumann A, Hajji A, Rekik M, Pellerin R. A model for advanced planning systems dedicated to the Engineer-To-Order context. International Journal of Production Economics. 2022;252:108557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108557

23. Neumann A, Hajji A, Rekik M, Pellerin R. Genetic algorithms for planning and scheduling engineer-to-order production: a systematic review. International Journal of Production Research. 2024;62:2888–2917. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2237122

24. Neumann A, Hajji A, Rekik M, Pellerin R. Integrated planning and scheduling of engineer-to-order projects using a Lamarckian Layered Genetic Algorithm. International Journal of Production Economics. 2024;267:109077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.109077

25. Olson DL, Wu D, Shanlin Y, Lambert JH. Complex product manufacturing in the intelligence-connected era. International Journal of Production Research. 2019;57(21):6702–6704. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1645442

26. Poeschl S, Wirth F, Bauernhansl T. Strategic process planning for commissioning processes in mechanical engineering. International Journal of Production Research. 2019;57(21):6727–6739. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1556408

27. Stefano G, Denicol J, Broyd T, Davies A. What are the strategies to manage megaproject supply chains? A systematic literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Project Management. 2023;41(3):102457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102457

28. Vodomerov NK. The systematic development of mechanical engineering is a key link in increasing the competitiveness of the Russian economy. Journal of Regional and International Competitiveness. 2023;4(1):35–48. https://www.elibrary.ru/FYUDDB

JATS XML

Chairman of the International Editorial Board

Vladimir Kvint

Editor-in-Chief

Albert Bakhtizin

albert.bakhtizin@gmail.com

Editorial board member

Anna Khvorostyanaya

Khvorostyanayaas@gmail.com

GOST

Krayushkina V. V., Varenik M. S. Key Elements of Technological Independence Strategy in Russian Mechanical Engineering // . 2024. pp. 481-498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-2435-2024-4-4-481-498. (Date of access 20.08.2026).

MLA

Valeriya Krayushkina, Varenik M. S.. "Key Elements of Technological Independence Strategy in Russian Mechanical Engineering." (2024): 481-498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-2435-2024-4-4-481-498.

APA

Krayushkina V. V., Varenik M. S. (2024). Key Elements of Technological Independence Strategy in Russian Mechanical Engineering. , 481-498. https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-2435-2024-4-4-481-498

Chicago

Valeriya Krayushkina, Varenik M. S.. "Key Elements of Technological Independence Strategy in Russian Mechanical Engineering." , no. (2024): 481-498. https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-2435-2024-4-4-481-498.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Krayushkina V. V., Varenik M. S. | title = Key Elements of Technological Independence Strategy in Russian Mechanical Engineering | journal = | year = 2024 | pages = 481-498 | doi = 10.21603/2782-2435-2024-4-4-481-498 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

KEY ELEMENTS OF TECHNOLOGICAL INDEPENDENCE STRATEGY IN RUSSIAN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING Key Elements of Technological Independence Strategy in Russian Mechanical Engineering

Confirmation