Directions for Improving State Judicial Policy in Legal Costs in the Context of Justice Accessibility

Mihail Roze

doi:10.21603/2542-1840-2024-8-1-148-158

VAK Russia

5.1.3

DIRECTIONS FOR IMPROVING STATE JUDICIAL POLICY IN LEGAL COSTS IN THE CONTEXT OF JUSTICE ACCESSIBILITY Directions for Improving State Judicial Policy in Legal Costs in the Context of Justice Accessibility

АА Аа

Published in Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences · Pages 148–158 · Rubric: Private and Civil Law

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2024-8-1-148-158

Received: 05.01.2024 Accepted: 29.01.2024 Published: 14.03.2024

Authors

Mihail Roze

Kemerovo State University Russian Federation · Kemerovo

ABSTRACT

Court appeal is an integral component of the constitutional right to judicial protection. This paper introduces ways to improve the institution of civil court costs through the prism of justice accessibility. The author studied the optimal mechanisms for paying state fees at civil court; the direct connection between the benefits for the payment of state duty, the principle of justice accessibility, and the right to judicial protection; grounds for granting benefits for the payment of state duty. The author finds it highly undesirable to increase the rates of state duty because this factor can affect the scope of guarantees for judicial protection. However, the current inflation creates prerequisites for an increase in the cost of civil trials for the state, which means expanding the criteria for benefits. A judicial practice analysis revealed no uniformity in the provision of benefits for the payment of state duty but identified the grounds for the application of certain preferential mechanisms. The author proposes to introduce additional guarantees for the right to legal protection, e.g., the institution of financing court costs by a third party, not involved in the case but with guarantees for reimbursement of their costs for financing the trial. The mechanism for investing court costs could be tested in group proceedings.

KEYWORDS

state duty, benefits for paying state duty, legal costs, class action, accessibility of justice, right to judicial protection, third party financing of legal costs, investing in litigation

1. Balakin Yu. N. Demand for conciliation procedures: view of professional representatives. Arbitration, 2019, (1/2): 271-277. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/asvgpy

2. Potapova L. V. The main problems of the development of the institution of conciliation procedures in a civil procedure. Arbitrazh and civil procedure, 2021, (3): 40-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383X-2021-3-40-43 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KEUMOR

3. Pustovalov E. V. Debt confirmed by primary accounting documents as a basis for consideration of a case under summary procedure. Arbitrazh and civil procedure, 2017, (1): 60-64. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/xwqwbf

4. Kurochkin S. A. Rules on litigation costs as a means of ensuring efficiency of civil and arbitral procedures. Arbitrazh and civil procedure, 2021, (11): 14-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383X-2021-11-14-18 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HWISZA

5. Chetvergov A. I. The state duty institution in civil proceedings: new approaches towards the analysis. Arbitrazh and civil procedure, 2019, (10): 28-32. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/ieupbh

6. Savinov K. A. Institute of state duty when applying to the court: topical issues of improvement. Russian justice, 2020, (1): 66-70. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/futlsr

7. Yarkov V. V., Abushenko D. B., Branovitsky K. L., Zagaynova S. K., Kudryavtseva V. P., Kuznetsov E. N., Kuliushin E. N., Mamaeva A. A., Pleshanov A. G., Razdyakonov E. S., Reshetnikova I. V., Renz I. G., Spitsin I. N., Tarasov I. N., Timofeev Y. A., Tsaregorodtseva E. A., Sheremetova G. S. Civil and administrative proceedings. Moscow: Statut, 2021, 460. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/kxhdme

8. Mikhaylova E. V. On the concept of the institution of financing of legal costs by third parties. Magistrate Judge, 2021, (10): 25-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-4152-2021-10-25-32 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GGCNNC

9. Vodolagin S. V. Legal responsibility of heads of organizations: Russian perspectives taking into account foreign experience. Property relations in the Russian Federation, 2021, (5): 85-95. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2072-4098-2021-5-85-95 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HOKOLQ

10. Eliseev N. G. Procedural agreement. Moscow: Statut, 2015, 368. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vddzbb

11. Shemeneva O. N. Procedural agreements in civil legal proceedings: definition, types, practical importance of differentiation with civil contracts. Herald of Civil Procedure, 2020, 10(4): 131-148. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-4-131-148 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XJQSBO

12. Mustafin R. F., Mustafina S. A., Ilyashenko E. A. Institute of judicial investment: status and development prospects. Jurist-Pravoved, 2020, (4): 192-195. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qlccrq

13. Rusinova E. R. Legal consequences of abuse of procedural rights in disposal of rights in a lawsuit. Arbitrazh and civil procedure, 2023, (7): 24-25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383X-2023-7-24-25 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TKPLOV

14. Polyakov S. B. Judicial precedent in Russia: form of law or form of abuse of discretion? Lex Russica, 2015, 100(3): 28-42. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tmzszf

15. Arakelyan A. A. Good faith in English contract law (analysis of the precedents of the Supreme Court of England and Wales). Actual problems of Russian law, 2022, 17(5): 207-213. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2022.138.5.207-213 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VSGTAW

16. Sutormin N. A. Class action lawsuit in Australia. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2021, 17(4): 95-109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.12737/jflcl.2021.044 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JDNKRT

17. Romanova V. E. Problems of proving in incurred legal costs in the representation of interests of clients by large Russian and foreign associations of attorneys and law firms. Advocate's practice, 2021, (5): 42-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18572/1999-4826-2021-5-42-47 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZKOCDE

18. Absalyamov A. V., Abushenko D. B., Branovitsky K. L., Degtyarev S. L., Zagaynova S. K., Kuznetsov E. N., Renz I. G., Razdyakonov E. S., Reshetnikova I. V., Skuratovskiy M. L., Tarasov I. N., Timofeev Y. A., Chudinovskaya N. A., Yarkov V. V. Arbitration process. Moscow: Statut, 2017, 752. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zvdkmn

19. Ilyin A. V. Assignment of the right to reimbursement of legal expenses. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiia Rossijskoi Federatsii, 2021, (8): 30-48. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/mnyysf

20. Vilkova T. Yu. Implementation of the constitutional obligation of the state to ensure access to justice in the context of digital technologies development. Actual problems of Russian law, 2020, 15(8): 155-163. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.117.8.155-163 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ATUOFW

21. Mitina T. V. Judicial proceedings aspects of the right to access to justice. Court’s administrator, 2019, (2): 13-18. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ruwgdp

22. Selkova A. A. Understanding efficiency and representation as objectivies of a class action. Lex Russica, 2023, 76(6): 90-99. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2023.199.6.090-099 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZJBKDF

23. Yarkov V. V. Class action in the project of the unified code of civil procedure Russia. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiia Rossijskoi Federatsii, 2015, (8): 100-111. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/uhvhvn

24. Domshenko V. G. Class action certification conditions. Vestnik jekonomicheskogo pravosudija Rossijskoj Federacii, 2023, (3): 121-151. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37239/2500-2643-2022-18-3-121-151 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HBRXYV

25. Ryabchikov G. Class action in arbitration proceedings. Iuridicheskii spravochnik rukovoditelia, 2021, (3): 39-50. (In Russ.)

26. Trezubov E. S., Zvyagina N. S. The legal status of the class members during the group litigation. RUDN Journal of Law, 2023, 27(4): 1065-1078. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2023-27-4-1065-1078 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NIQHXP

27. Trezubov E. S., Zvyagina N. S. Problems of achieving legal efficiency in the consideration of class actions. Pravoprimenenie, 2023, 7(1): 113-123. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(1).113-123 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WTCJMN

28. Abolonin G. O. Mass lawsuits. Moscow: Wolters Kluwer, 2011, 416. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qxrwaf

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

JATS XML

Chief editor

Irina Morozova

ishmorozova@yandex.ru

Deputy Editor-in-Chief

Egor Trezubov

egortrezubov@mail.ru

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Creative Commons

GOST

Roze M. A. Directions for Improving State Judicial Policy in Legal Costs in the Context of Justice Accessibility // . 2024. pp. 148-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2024-8-1-148-158. (Date of access 19.08.2026).

MLA

Mihail Roze. "Directions for Improving State Judicial Policy in Legal Costs in the Context of Justice Accessibility." (2024): 148-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2024-8-1-148-158.

APA

Roze M. A. (2024). Directions for Improving State Judicial Policy in Legal Costs in the Context of Justice Accessibility. , 148-158. https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2024-8-1-148-158

Chicago

Mihail Roze. "Directions for Improving State Judicial Policy in Legal Costs in the Context of Justice Accessibility." , no. (2024): 148-158. https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2024-8-1-148-158.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Roze M. A. | title = Directions for Improving State Judicial Policy in Legal Costs in the Context of Justice Accessibility | journal = | year = 2024 | pages = 148-158 | doi = 10.21603/2542-1840-2024-8-1-148-158 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

DIRECTIONS FOR IMPROVING STATE JUDICIAL POLICY IN LEGAL COSTS IN THE CONTEXT OF JUSTICE ACCESSIBILITY Directions for Improving State Judicial Policy in Legal Costs in the Context of Justice Accessibility

Confirmation