1. Voronin P. Sociology and Internet: successful dialogue. Public Opinion Foundation, Database, 15.01.2005. Available at: http://bd.fom.ru/report/cat/smi/smi_int/gur050105 (accessed 24.04.2019). (In Russ.)

2. Terentiev E. A., Nefedova A. I., Gruzdev I. A. Visualization of questionnaire in on line surveys: how different design features impact the data quality. Monitoring of public opinion: Economic and social change, 2016, (5): 1-15. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2016.5.01.

3. Sukhorykov D. V. Structural functional specific of urban environment as factor of socio-cultural development. Alma mater (Vestnik Vysshey Shkoly), 2018, (6): 116-120. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.06-18.116.

4. McQuire S. Geomedia: Networked cities and the future of public space. Moscow: Strelka Press, 2018, 268. (In Russ.)

5. Hayek F. Initialism and the economic order, tr. Dmitrieva O. A., ed. Kapelyushnikov R. I. Chelyabinsk: Sotsium, 2011, 394. (In Russ.)

6. Kozyrkov V. P. Character domesticates a modern society. Vestnik of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod. Series: Social Sciences, 2009, (4): 86-92. (In Russ.)

7. Zhelnina A. A., Tikanova E. V. Formal and informal civic infrastructure: contemporary studies of urban local activism in Russia. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii, 2019, 22(1): 162-192. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2019.22.1.8

8. Pilkington H., Pollock G. "Politics are bollocks": youth, politics and activism in contemporary Europe. The Sociological Review, 2015, 63(S2): 1-35. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1111/1467-954X.12260

9. Giddens A. Central problems in social theory: action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. UC Press, 1979, 306.

10. Chicherin B. N. Philosophy of law. Moscow: Tipo-litografiia Tovarishchestva I. N. Kushnerev i K°, 1900, 337. (In Russ.)

11. Bourdieu P. Sociology of social space. St. Petersburg: Aleteia, 2013, 288. (In Russ.)

12. Shpak L. L., Logunova L. Yu., Golovatsky E. V., Kranzeeva E. A. Political consciousness and behavior: evolution and mobilization. Kemerovo: INT, 2016, 151. (In Russ.)

13. Ilyin V. I. Social structurization in the transitive space of the Russian metropolis. Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiia. Etnologiia, 2010, 19(1): 89-125. (In Russ.)

14. Malakhova N. N. Innovative personality as a producer and a consumer: economic and socio-cultural consequences of formation and functioning. RUDN Journal of Economics, 2015, (1): 127-137. (In Russ.)

15. Inkeles A., Diamond L., Levinson D. J., Beier H., Hanfmann E. National character: a psycho-social perspective. Transaction Publishers, 1997, 392.

16. Orlova E. A. Modern urban culture and man. Moscow: Nauka, 1987, 193. (In Russ.)

17. Nikovskaya L. I., Yakimets V. N., Molokova M. A. Civic initiatives and modernization of Russia. Moscow: Kliuch-S, 2011, 335. (In Russ.)

18. 335 s.

19. Yagodka N. N. Civic initiatives as an instrument of dialogue between government and civil society in Russia. RUDN Journal of Political Science, 2015, (4): 128-140. (In Russ.)

20. Barash R. E. Factors of information and communication in self-organization of the Russians. Vlast, 2015, (11): 101-109. (In Russ.)

21. Golovatsky E. V. New sociology in the changed world: a review on "Normal anomie" in Russia and the modern world" (edited by S. A. Kravchenko, Moscow: MGIMO-University, 2017). Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Politicheskie, sotsiologicheskie i ekonomicheskie nauki, 2018, (4): 177-182. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.21603/2500-3372-2018-4-177-182

22. "Normal anomie" in Russia and the modern world, ed. Kravchenko S. A. Moscow: MGIMO-Universitet, 2017, 281. (In Russ.)

23. Marien S., Hooghe M., Quintelier E. Inequalities in non-institutionalised forms of political participation: a multi-level analysis of 25 countries. Political Studies, 2010, 58(1): 187-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00801.x

24. Fukuyama F. Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Quarterly, 2001, 22(1): 7-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713701144

25. Guseynova K. E. Breakthrough innovative projects as a solution to the problems of strategic development of the country. Research result. Sociology and management, 2018, 4(4): 78-86. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-9338-2018-4-4-0-7

26. Larina T. I., Iliina A. A. Reconstruction of social representations of the city using the GO-ALONG technique. Monitoring of public opinion: Economic and social change, 2016, (3): 20-32. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2016.4.02

27. Opritnaia O. P. Trinitarian approach as methodological basis of complexity management. Sotsiologiia: 4M, 2005, (21): 29-50. (In Russ.)

28. Online research in Russia 2.0, ed. Davydov S. G. Moscow: Severo-Vostok, 2010, 336. (In Russ.)