graduate student from 01.01.2015 to 01.01.2019
Russian Federation
The Public Chamber is currently attracting a lot of scientific attention. The present research owes its relevance to the fact that the Public Chamber remains passive, despite claiming an important role in the development of civil society. The research objective was to identify the place and role of the Public Chamber in the regional socio-political life. The article focuses on its ability to act as a mediator between the government and civil society. The author sees the Public Chamber as a communication platform, which allows the scientific community to influence public policy by acting as experts. The empirical study lasted from February to June 2020 and involved former and current members of the Public Chamber of the Kemerovo region, as well as its researchers and experts. The analysis was based on the qualitative approach and the methods of informal expert interviews, comparative analysis, and content analysis. The author identified two main criteria: the model of regional power and the regional political regime. These criteria determine the final configuration, i.e. the influence and role of the Public Chamber in the regional public policy. The Public Chamber appeared to be more of an imitator than a real actor in the field of the local public policy. The paper also introduces a new classification of the development of the Public Chamber in the Kemerovo region.
scientific and expert community, institute of mediator, interaction of scientific and expert community and authorities, civil society and authorities, civil society
1. Grib V. V. Interaction of state authorities and civil society institutions in the Russian Federation: constitutional and legal aspects, 2nd ed. Moscow: Iurist, 2011, 401. (In Russ.)
2. Sadovnikova G. D. Public chamber of the Russian Federation and its role in the development of institutions of national representation in Russia. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo, 2006, (1): 17-20. (In Russ.)
3. Kiryanov A. Yu. Interaction features of the Public chamber of the Russian Federation and regional public chambers in matters of social control. Vestnik Novgorodskogo filiala RANKhiGS, 2018, 7(1-1): 17-24. (In Russ.)
4. Goncharov V. V. About some questions of the organization and activity of Public chamber of the Russian Federation. Sovremennoe pravo, 2010, (4): 50-54. (In Russ.)
5. Zagrebin A. E., Pozdeev I. L. Organizational and legal aspects of the involvement of civil society institutions in social control (the experience of the Public chamber of the Udmurt Republic). Vestn. Udm. un-ta. Ser. Ekonomika i pravo, 2015, 25(3): 111-117. (In Russ.)
6. Bobritskikh I. V., Kumskova D. I., Merkulova A. I. The Public Chamber of the Volgograd region as an organ of social control: the legal basis of organization and activity problem. Trends in the development of modern society: Proc. IV Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Volzhsky, June 15, 2015. Volzhsky, 2015, 189-196. (In Russ.)
7. Abakumov S. A. From the Civil Forum to the creation of the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Galeriia, 2005, 342. (In Russ.)
8. Petrov N. V. Public Chamber: for the government or for society? Pro et Contra, 2006, 10(1): 40-58. (In Russ.)
9. Rudenko V. N. Consultative public councils: specifics of their organization and work. Politicheskaia ekspertiza: POLITEKS, 2006, 2(3): 143-155. (In Russ.)
10. Tarasenko A. V. Activity of Public Chambers in the regions of Russia: efficiency vs. fictitiousness. Politeia, 2010, (1): 80-88. (In Russ.)
11. Evstifeev R. V. Public chambers of the subjects of the Russian Federation in the regional system of government: the main problems of functioning and evaluation of the efficiency of work. Research Result. Sociology and management, 2018, 4(4): 87-100. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-9338-2018-4-4-0-8
12. Sungurov A. Iu., Kozlova N. N., Evstafev R. V., Briantsev I. I. Public Chambers in the subjects of the Russian Federation: between mediation and imitation. St. Petersburg: Aleteiia, 2020, 252. (In Russ.)
13. Rogov K. Iu. Democracy-2010: the past and future of pluralism in Russia. Pro et Contra, 2009, 13(5-6): 6-30. (In Russ.)
14. McFaul M. Transitions from postcommunism. Journal of Democracy, 2005, 16(3): 5-19.
15. Sungurov A. Iu. How political innovations arise: "thought factories" and other institutions mediators. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2015, 382. (In Russ.)
16. Biryukov S. V. Regional political power: institutions, structures, and mechanisms. Dr. Polit. Sci. Diss. Moscow, 2009, 575. (In Russ.)
17. Zolotov A., Simonian R. Kh. Restless everyday life of Kuzbass. Narodnyi deputat, 1992, (16): 32-39. (In Russ.)
18. Shashkova Ya. Yu. Party system in the processes of political transformation and elections in the Russian Federation (as in the case of South-Western Siberia). Dr. Polit. Sci. Diss. Chita, 2011, 393. (In Russ.)
19. Lebedev V. A. Participation of NGOs in the process of adoption of regional draft laws and socio-economic programs. Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat, 1998, 168. (In Russ.)
20. Public chamber of the Kemerovo region: ten-year experience in the formation of civil society, comp. Lebedev V. A. Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat, 2004, 152. (In Russ.)
21. Chirun S. N. Problems of the functioning of the regional political regime on the example of Kemerovo oblast. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 2018, (44): 253-268. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/44/24
22. Matveeva E. V., Mitin A. A. Modern trends in the institutionalization of civil society in Kemerovo region (Kuzbass): a regional study. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Politicheskie, sotsiologicheskie i ekonomicheskie nauki, 2020, 5(1): 25-32. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.21603/2500-3372-2020-5-1-25-32
