EFFECTS OF CHITOSAN COATING ENRICHED WITH THYME ESSENTIAL OIL AND PACKAGING METHODS ON A POSTHARVEST QUALITY OF PERSIAN WALNUT UNDER COLD STORAGE
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
This study evaluated the effects of edible coatings and different packaging methods on the shelf-life and quality of walnut kernels. It focused on the coatings with chitosan (1%) and thyme essential oil (TEO) at concentra- tions of 500 and 1,000 μl L–1 (CT , CT ) or with chitosan alone (CT). The effects of the coatings was assessed 500 1,000 for different packaging methods (LP, loose packaging; PP, packaging in polypropylene bags; and AP, active packa- ging) as contrasted to control walnuts (C). Walnuts were stored for 120 days in darkness, with relative humidity of 55%, at 4°C. The results showed that the L* index and moisture content of the samples in the chitosan with 500 and 1,000 μl L–1 thyme essential oil in active packaging were maximum, whereas peroxide and conjugated diene values were minimum. The lowest rate of mold growth was observed for the chitosan samples with 500 μl L–1 thyme es- sential oil in active packaging. The best overall acceptability score was related to the samples with chitosan alone and the chitosan with 500 μl L–1 thyme essential oil in active packaging. The chitosan alone and the chitosan with 500 μl L–1 thyme essential oil in active packaging are recommended for storage of kernels at 4°C.

Keywords:
Active packaging, chitosan, thyme essential oil, quality, walnut
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download

Walnuts play an important part in human diet since ancient times. The walnut (Juglans regia L.) is quite widespread  in  Iran.  During  storage,  kernels  undergo a series of biochemical, physiological, and structural changes, which make them unacceptable to consume- rs. Walnut is a nutrient-rich food mainly because of its high biological value proteins (low lysine/arginine ratio), high levels of oil (60 g/100 g in average mainly polyunsa- turated fatty acids, or PUFA) [1]. Although fatty acids in walnuts have nutritional value, higher amounts of PUFA (owning unsaturated bands) may cause a poorer quality resistance and a shorter shelf-life [2]. Low oxygen pre- vent lipid oxidation. The most common oxidation indica- tors in oils are peroxide value (PV) and conjugated diene

 

value (CDV) [3]. Walnut kernels contain bioactive com- pounds such as phenols, so polyphenols are subject to oxidation [4, 5]. The walnut kernel can darken due to oxi- dation of phenolic compounds. L* index shows bright- ness of products [6]. Moisture is one of the important factors of the quality of nuts [7]. Moisture content (MC) of nuts has a profound effect on their physical, chemical, mechanical, aerodynamic, and thermal properties [8]. Postharvest operations are expected to have a major im- pact on the microbial contamination of nuts [9]. Among various microbes, fungi are known to play a significant role in the spoilage and loss of stored plant products [10].

Food safety issue requires safe methods with  no toxic substances. In recent years, edible coatings have been one of the most innovative ways to improve the

 

 

Copyright © 2019, Talebi Habashi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.

 

 

 

commercial shelf life of fruits. An edible coating, such as chitosan, makes a barrier against moisture, oxygen, and dissolved materials and protects foodstuff from microbial, chemical, and mechanical damages [11, 12]. Chitosan has a higher expansion and elasticity, as well as anti-viral, anti-bacterial, anti-fungi, and antioxidant effects due to different amounts of free amine groups. It can participate in the reactions by forming hydrogen and ionic bonds [13]. Chitosan reduced the growth of Asper- gillus flavus, the absorption of moisture, and the rate of oxidative reactions [14]. Essential oils (EOs) have been extensively studied as additives in bio-based emulsified coatings. One example is the study by Campos-Requena et al. based  on  carvacrol  and  thymol,  both  included in HDPE/modified  montmorillonite  nanocomposite films [15]. Thyme essential oil (TEO) contains high le- vels of phenolic compounds, such as thymol and carvac- rol. The main component of non-phenolic compounds in TEO is paracymin. Thymol, carvacrol, and paracymin are all antioxidant agents [16]. Although edible coatings create a barrier against oxygen and moisture, they are not perfect replacement of synthetic packaging [17]. A large variety of active packaging systems have been de- veloped and. Today, numerous reviews have emphasized the potential of active packaging technologies to supply safer, ‘healthier’, and higher-quality foods to consumers [18]. Active packaging is characterized by changing the inside atmosphere of the packed food [19]. Unfavorable flavors, caused by rancidity during storage of the pro- duct, did not appear when oxygen adsorbents were ap- plied [2].

 

ging in polypropylene bags (PP), and active packaging in polypropylene bags containing sachets (AP). At the end, packets were stored in a dark cold room (55% RH, 4°C for 120 days) and tested every 60 days.

Compositional  analysis.  The   kernels   were ground using a home  grinder  (La  Moulinette; Moulinex, Lyon, France). The protein was de- termined by means of the  micro-Kjeldahl  pro- cedure, using 5.4 as a conversion factor. The fat contents were evaluated by Soxhlet extraction. The total ash was determined by weighing the dry mine- ral residue of the samples obtained  at  500–550°C. The total amount of carbohydrate was measured by sub- tracting the amount of ash, protein, and fat from the to- tal dry matter. The moisture contents of the kernels were determined by oven-drying at 103 ± 2°C [21].

Oil extraction and quality analyses. The oil was extracted from kernels using n-hexane solvent without additional heat treatment. About 50 g of ground walnut was mixed with 50 ml of n-hexane (J.T. Baker, Deventer, Holland) and stirred for 30 min. The n-hexane extract was filtered, and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure using a rotavapor (RE 111; Büchi, Flawil, Swit- zerland) [22].

Peroxide value (PV). First, the acetic acid-chloro- form solution and the saturated potassium iodide (KI) solution were added to the oil sample. Second, 30 ml of distilled water was added, then 0.01-N sodium thiosul- fate was slowly titrated while shaking the flask vigorous- ly near the end point which was indicated by a faint blue

color. Third, the sodium thiosulfate (Na S O ) was added

 

2   2    3

 

This study investigates the effects of chitosan coating

enriched with thyme essential oil and types of packaging on the postharvest quality of Persian walnut under cold storage.

 

STUDY OBJECTS AND METHODS

The study was conducted with walnuts (Juglans re- gia L.) purchased from the local market. Walnuts were shelled manually. The kernels were dried at room tem- perature till moisture contents of 3.16 ± 0.03%. The chemicals were supplied by Merck and AppliChem Companies. Sachets for active packaging were prepared with ascorbic acid, sodium bicarbonate, and iron powder with the 1:1:1 ratio.

The chitosan solution (1%, w/v) was prepared by dis- solving chitosan powder in glacial acetic acid (1%, v/v). The solution was heated, and then glycerol was added as a plasticizer [20]. Tween 80 was used to achieve uniform distribution of essential oil inside the coating solution. TEO (500 and 1,000 μl L–1) was added to the solution; finally the uniform solutions were exposed to UV light for 1 hour for sterilization.

First, the kernels were soaked in the coating solu- tions for 60 s. Second, the samples were dried at room temperature. The treatments resulted in four samples: control, i.e.  uncoated  (C);  coated with  chitosan  (CT); coated with chitosan containing 500 μl L–1  of thyme es-

 

dropwise until the blue color disappeared. Finally, the peroxide value (meq/kg–1) of oil was calculated accor- ding to the following equation:

V × N × 1000

PV =                                      ,

W

where V is the volume of the applied sodium thiosulfate, (ml); N is the normality of the thiosulfate, and W is the oil weight, g [23].

Conjugated diene value (CDV). The CDV was de- termined at a wavelength of 233 nm, using isooctane as an oil solvent. 0.1–0.3 g of oil was mixed with the isooc- tane solution. The amount of solution adsorption was determined at a wavelength of 233 nm with a spectro- photometer (Pharmacia, England) [24].

L*  index.  L*  index   (black/white)   of   the   ker- nel was measured using a HunterLab colorimeter (model D65/10) [25].

Mold count. 5 g of each sample was transferred into a sterile stomacher bag under aseptic conditions and di- luted 1:10 (w/v) with sterile peptone water (0.1%, w/v, Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany). Then the samples were homogenized for 2 min by means of a stomacher (Seward Laboratory, London, UK). The series of dilu- tions were prepared by adding 1 ml of each concentration to 9 ml of sterile peptone water (0.1% w/v). In order to count mold, 0.1 ml of each dilution was transferred onto

 

sential oil (CT

 

); and coated with chitosan containing

 

the potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium using the surface

 

500

1,000 μl L–1  of thyme essential oil (CT

 

). Third, each

 

culture method and was incubated at 25°C for 5 days [21].

 

1,000

sample was divided into three equal parts, and then they

were packed as follows: loose packaging (LP), packa-

 

Sensory evaluation. A panel of 10 members eva- luated the overall acceptance using the 9-point Hedo-

 

 

Table 1. Compositional analysis of walnut kernels

 

Ash, %

Moisture, %

Fat, %

Protein, %

Carbohydrate, %

1.79 ± 0.11

3.16 ± 0.03

59.14 ± 0.66

15.07 ± 0.65

20.39 ± 0.56

Note: Mean values ± standard deviation over three replicates

 

 

Table 2. Effect of coatings and packaging methods on mois- ture content of kernels

 

Moisture content, %

Packaging

Coatings

 

Storage time, days

 

 

 

1

60

120

LP

C

CT CT

500

CT

1,000

2.25Ca

5.56Ba

5.97ABa

6.86Aa

2.06Cab

4.21Bb

4.35Bb

4.81Bb

1.30Db

2.97Cc

3.53BCc

3.73Bc

PP

C CT

CT

500

CT

                                           1,000                                                                                                    

2.25Ca

5.56Ba

5.97ABa

6.86Aa

2.09Ca

4.95Ba

5.89ABa

6.04Aba

2.02CDa

4.68Ba

5.46Aa

5.96Aa

AP

C CT

CT

500

CT

1,000

2.25Ca

5.56Ba

5.97ABa

6.86Aa

2.21Ca

5.42Ba

5.73ABa

6.62Aa

2.18Ca

5.20ABa

5.85Aa

6.29Aa

500

 
Note: C is the control sample; CT is coated with 1% chitosan; CT

Moisture absorption in the coating can be effective- ly decreased due to the hydrophobic characteristics of TEO, which were placed in empty spaces between the polymer chains [28]. In agreement with the previously reported data, the water vapor permeability of coatings was reduced by adding coriander, citronella, tarragon, and TEO [29]. Active packaging ensures a high concen- tration of carbon dioxide and a high relative humidity in- side the package atmosphere [30].

Peroxide value (PV) and conjugated diene value (CDV). The analysis of variance showed the significant interaction effects (p < 0.05) for coating treatments, packaging methods, and time of storage. Coating treat- ments and time of storage, packaging methods and time of storage, coating treatments and packaging methods influenced the peroxide value and conjugated diene value considerably. The trend of CDV was similar to trends obtained for PV. There is a positive correlation between peroxide value and conjugated diene content

in walnut [31].

 

and CT

 

are coated with 1% chitosan containing 500 and 1,000 μl

 

1,000

L–1  TEO, respectively. LP, PP, and AP are loose packaging, packa-

ging in polypropylene bags, and active packaging, respectively. Su- perscript lower letters (a–d) beside mean values in the same row and superscript upper letters (A–D) beside mean values in the same co- lumn show the difference in Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).

Standard error mean = 0.35

 

nic scale: 1 = dislike extremely; 2 = dislike very much; 3 = dislike moderately; 4 = dislike slightly; 5 = neither like nor dislike; 6 = like slightly; 7 = like moderately; 8 = like very much; 9 = like extremely. The panelists had sensory evaluation experience and were trained in de-

 

The initial PV in the walnut was about 0.04 meq/kg–1.

500                      1,000

 
The fresh walnut kernels in different cultivars had the peroxide values between 0.015–0.29 meq/kg–1; the di- versity can be related to the variety of the walnut trees and the weather conditions they grew up in [1]. During storage, the PV and CDV increased in all samples, the maximum amounts were detected in the C and the mini- mum amounts, in the CT and CT samples (Table 3). Chitosan prevents the reactive oxygen  species  (ROS) and the lipid oxidation in food and biological systems because of its antioxidant capacity [32]. Chitosan has

antioxidant activity against free radicals [33]. The low

 

scriptive evaluation of nuts.

 

PV and CDV of CT

 

and CT

 

samples can be at-

 

Statistical analysis. The research employed a facto-

 

500                        1,000

tributed to antioxida       ropertie            TEO. Baldwin et al.

 

nt p

 

s of

 

rial method in the form of a complete randomized design

with four replications. Data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by LSD test (p < 0.05) to distinguish differences among the treatments. Statistical analyses and Pearson correlation coefficients between traits were analyzed using SPSS software 20.00.

 

also reported similar results in reducing the PV in oil of pecans [34]. The increasing of PV in the walnut during storage has also been reported [35].

 

Table 3. Effects of coating treatments and time of storage on

PV and CDV of kernels

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 

 

Test

 

 

Coating

 

 

        Storage time, days        

 

The  chemical  compositions  of  the  kernels  were

 

treatments   1

 

60           120

 

shown in Table 1.

Peroxide value,

C

0.04Ac

1.15ABb

2.82Aa

Moisture. As a result of the analysis of variance,

meq/kg oil

CT

0.04Ac

1.45Ab

2.09Ba

the interaction effect of coating treatments and pack-

 

CT

500

0.04Ac

1.03Bb

1.62Ba

aging methods on the moisture content was significant

 

CT

1,000

0.04Ac

0.97Bb

1.25Ca

(p < 0.05). At the end of storage, the coated samples

Conjugated diene

C

4.88Ac

5.94ABb

7.543Aa

had the highest moisture. The minimum and maximum moisture content was observed in LP and AP, respective-

value, µmol/g

CT CT

500

4.88 Ac

4.88 Ac

6.231Ab

5.828Bb

6.844Ba

6.393BCa

ly (Table 2). The hydrophobicity characteristic of chi-

 

CT

1,000

4.88 Ac

5.771Ba

6.039Ca

 

500

 
tosan is conditioned by the acetyl groups in its structure,

1,000

 
which has not been completely deacetylated. Besides, re- sidual acetyl groups in chitosan play a role in preventing water vapor transmission [26]. Chitosan also decreases weight loss of guava [27].

20

 

Note: C is the control sample; CT is coated with 1% chitosan; CT and CT      are coated with 1% chitosan containing 500 and 1,000 μl L–1 TEO, respectively. Superscript lower letters (a–c) beside mean va- lues in the same row and superscript upper letters (A–C) beside mean values in the same column show the difference in Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05). Standard error mean = 0.15

 

 

 

Table 4. Effects of packaging methods and time of storage

on PV and CDV of kernels

 

Table 6. Effects of coating treatments and packaging methods on L* index of walnuts

 

 

                       

 

Test

 

Pack-

 

Storage time, days

 

Packaging

 

Coatings

 

Storage time, days

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

aging

1

60

120

 

 

 

1

60

120

Peroxide value, meq/kg oil

LP

0.04 Ac

1.33Ab

2.92Aa

 

LP

C

74.87Aa

70.09Aab

59.76Cb

 

PP

0.04 Ac

0.95Bb

1.99Ba

 

 

CT

62.73Bb

68.42Ab

70.03Ba

 

AP

0.04 Ac

0.58Cb

1.30Ca

 

 

CT

500

76.34Aa

74.23Aa

72.74Ba

Conjugated diene value,

LP

4.88 Ac

6.11Ab

7.639Aa

 

 

CT

61.61Bb

72.94Aa

75.72Ba

 

 
                                         1,000                                                                                                       

 

µmol/g

 

PP         4.88 Ac

AP        4.88 Ac

 

5.752Bb

5.395Bb

 

6.748Ba                 PP

6.08Ba

 

C                  74.87Aa

CT                62.73Bb

 

72.95Aa

69.08Ab

 

65.05BCb

74.46Ba

 

Note: LP, PP, and AP are loose packaging, polypropylene bags, and active packaging, respectively. Superscript lower letters (a–c) beside mean values in the same row and superscript upper letters (A–C) be-

side mean values in the same column show the difference in Duncan’s   AP

multiple range test (p < 0.05). Standard error mean = 0.13 for PV and

0.15 for CDV

 

Tables 4 and 5 showed that the maximum PV and

 

 

CT

 

CT

500

 

1,000

CT

C CT

CT

500

 

1,000


76.34Aa

61.61Bb

74.87Aa

62.73Bb

76.34Aa

61.61Bb


78.18Aa

74.86Aa

67.81Bb

69.80ABab

77.85Aa

65.44Cb


79.85ABa

79.43ABa

72.58Bab

78.87Ba

83.17Aba

86.25Aa

 

CDV values were with LP and the minimum, with AP. In fact, oxygen is an oxidation resonator; the degree of rancidity was reduced by increasing the amount of car- bon dioxide inside the package. The mixture of ascorbic acid and sodium bicarbonate is used in active packa- ging, so carbon dioxide is produced by combining them. This system is used to increase the shelf-life of fresh meat and fish [36].

L* index. As a result of the analysis of variance, the effect of coating treatments and packaging methods on the L* index was significant (p < 0.05). The maximum

value was in the CT1,000 samples  with  active  packa- ging and the minimum, in the control sample with loose packaging (Table 6).

The walnut kernel has bioactive compounds such as phenols. The dark color of the walnut kernel in the con- trol sample may be caused by the enzymatic oxidation of carotenoids and phenolic compounds in the kernels [37]. Enzymatic browning of phenols in peanuts correlated

 

Note: C is the control sample; CT is coated with 1% chitosan; CT and CT     are coated with 1% chitosan containing 500 and 1,000 μl L–1  TEO, respectively. LP, PP, and AP are loose packaging, packa- ging in polypropylene bags, and active packaging, respectively. Su- perscript lower letters (a–d) beside mean values in the same row and superscript upper letters (A–D) beside mean values in the same co- lumn show the difference in Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).

500

 

1,000

Standard error mean = 2.13

 

pounds. The highest L* index in AP resulted from the low oxygen content in the package. The acceptable value of the L* of walnut color was above 40 [39]. The L* in- dices of all samples were higher than 40, and the coated and actively packed samples had the highest L* index.

Mold count. As shown in Fig. 1a, the counts of mold in all samples increased during storage, but the con- trol sample count had the highest. In all the treatments, the growth of molds increased within 60 days, but af- ter that in the coated samples,  no  significant  change was observed in the growth of fungi. To the contrary,

in the control sample, the number of fungi increased to

 

with the decrease in the L* index during storage [38].

 

log10

 

3.67 CFU/g–1 by the end of storage.

 

The reason of high L* in CT500  and CT1,000  samples can be attributed to the antioxidant properties of chitosan

and TEO which inhibited the oxidation of phenolic com-

 

Table 5. Effects of coating treatments and packaging methods

on PV and CDV of walnut

 

Chitosan extends the product shelf life directly af- fecting the growth of fungi and other defense opera- tions, such as chitinase  accumulation,  which  reduces the inhibitory effect of fungal cell wall proteinase. Chi- tosan inhibits microorganisms such as gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria and fungi [40]. According to [41] and [42], chitosan coating in artichoke seeds reduced the activity of various fungi and microorganisms on toma- toes. Antifungal effect of chitosan coating on pears was reported by Xianghong et al. [43].

TEO in combination with chitosan coating decreased

 

 

CT

 

Test

Coatings

 

Package

 

 

 

LP

PP

AP

Peroxide value, meq/kg oil

C CT

3.48Aa

2.95Ba

2.91Ab

2.25ABb

2.48Ac

2.01Ab

 

500

CT


2.52BCa

2.34Ca


2.03BCb

2.06Cb


1.16Bc

1.06Bc


the fungi count: CT1,000  and CT500  samples had less mi-

 

 

                                                        1,000                                                                                         

 

crobial load than the others did. The main constituents

Conjugated diene

C

8.175Aa

7.629Ab

7.217Ab

of TEO are thym

value, µmol/g

CT

7.668Ba

6.997Bb

6.767Ab

bial effects [44].

 

 
ol and carvacrol, which have antimicro-

 

 

 

 

 

CT

 
500

CT

 

7.256Ba

7.08Ba

 

6.784Bb

6.815Bb

 

5.95Bc

5.857Bc

 

As  shown  in  Fig.  1b,  with  the  LP  method,  mold

growth was significantly higher than with other packa-

 

                                                        1,000                                                                                         

500

 

1,000

Note: C is the control sample; CT is coated with 1% chitosan; CT and CT     are coated with 1% chitosan containing 500 and 1,000 μl L–1 TEO, respectively. Superscript lower letters (a–c) beside mean va- lues in the same row and superscript upper letters (A–C) beside mean values in the same column show the difference in Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05). Standard error mean = 0.15 for PV and 0.17 for CDV

 

ging methods, but there was no significant difference be- tween PP and AP methods.

As shown in Fig. 1c, with the LP method, the hi- ghest mold growth was observed in the control sample, but there was no significant difference between the oth-

er  treatments.  The  maximum  and  minimum  growth

 

 

C

CT

CT

CT

500

LP

PP

AP

4

 

 

Mold, log CFU/g)

Подпись: Mold, log CFU/g)3

 

 

2

 

1

 

 

0

1                            60                          120

Time, days

 

 

1,000

 

CT500

 

CT1000

CT

500

CT

1,000

C                 CT

 

(a)

4

 

Mold, log CFU/g)

Подпись: Mold, log CFU/g)3

 

 

2

Fig. 2. Effects of treatments and packaging methods on overall

1                                                                                                        acceptability score of walnut kernels. C is the control sample;

 

500

 
CT is coated with 1% chitosan; CT

 

and CT

 
1,000

are coated

 

0

1                            60                           120

Time, days

LP                          PP                          AP

 

(b)

 

3

 

Mold, log CFU/g)

Подпись: Mold, log CFU/g)2

 

 

 

1

 

 

0

LP                          PP                          AP

Packaging method

CT500

CT1000

CT

500

CT

1,000

C                CT

(c)

Fig. 1. Effects of coating treatments (a) and packaging meth- ods (b) during storage and the effect of coating treatments and


with 1% chitosan containing 500 and 1,000 μl L–1 TEO,

respectively. LP, PP, and AP are loose packaging, packaging in polypropylene bags, and active packaging, respectively

(p < 0.05).

 

Sensory evaluation. As shown in Fig. 2, the AP and LP control samples had the highest and lowest overall acceptability score, respectively. The high overall accep- tability score in active packaging (AP) could be attribu- ted to the low peroxide content in the samples. Although peroxides themselves do not directly play a role in off-fla- vour, but the ingredients of their decomposition produce an undesirable flavour. Hydroperoxides break down to form short-chain compounds, including aldehydes, ke- tones, alcohols, acids, esters, lactones, ethers and hydro- carbons, which contribute to odor and taste [47].

500

There was no significant difference in CT and CT samples in all three packages. The results indicated that chitosan did not adversely affect the general acceptance score of the walnut kernel, which was similar to the pre- vious studies on walnut kernels, strawberries, and peeled

lychee [35, 48, 49].

 

packaging methods (c) on the growth of molds in the kernels.

C is the control sample; CT is coated with 1% chitosan; CT

 

 

CT

 
1,000

treatment resulted in the lowest sensory pro-

 

and CT

 

500

are coated with 1% chitosan containing 500 and

 

perties  with  all  three  kinds  of  packaging.  Therefore,

 

1,000

 

1,000

μl L–1

 

TEO, respectively. LP, PP, and AP are loose pa-

 

treatments  containing  high  levels  of  TEO  were  eva-

 

ckaging, packaging in polypropylene bags, and active packa- ging, respectively (p < 0.05).

 

luated as undesirable. This can be related to a high con-

centration  of  the  essence  oil.  The  overall  acceptance score for this treatment was higher with LP than with

 

was  in  CT  and  CT

 

samples,  respectively.  Active

 

other packaging methods. With LP, because of volatile

 

1,000

packaging had a better effect on controlling the growth

2

 
of molds. This could be due to creating an atmosphere with  higher  CO ,  which  inhibits  growth  of  microor-

characteristics of TEO, some of the TEO evaporated. It made the flavour score of the sample comparable to those with other packaging methods.

 

ganisms. CO

 

is the only gas that has a direct antimi-

 

2

crobial effect and increases the lag phase and growth

time during the logarithmic growth stage [45]. Packa- ging with the modified atmosphere (with a low oxy- gen and high carbon dioxide content) was effective in controlling fungal rot and protecting the quality in the

post-harvest period of fruits [46].

 
CONCLUSION

The shelf-life and quality of  the  walnut  kernel can be affected by some environment factors during storage.  Coating  materials  and  packaging   methods can be useful  for  prolonging  the  postharvest  quali- ty  of  crops.  The  study  results  showed  that  chitosan

 

 

 

and thyme essential oil coating  combined  with  ac- tive  packaging  had  a  significant  effect   on   redu- cing oil oxidation and growth of molds. They also pre- vented the loss of moisture and a decrease in L* va- lue, improving the sensory properties of the samples during storage. An increase in the essential oil up to 500 μl L–1 also improved the functional properties of chitosan coating. Compared with loose packaging, poly- propylene packaging was also  effective  in  protecting the qualitative properties of walnut. Active packaging

 

offered the considerable potential and proved the most

efficient.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank the department of hor- ticultural and food industry, science and research branch, Islamic Azad university, Tehran, for their help and support.

References

1. Savage G.P. Chemical Composition of Walnuts (Juglans regia L.) Grown in New Zealand. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 2001, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 75-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008175606698.

2. Mexis S.F., Badeka A.V., Riganakos K.A., Karakostas K.X., and Kontominas M.G. Effect of packaging and stor- age conditions on quality of shelled walnuts. Food Control, 2009, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 743-751. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2008.09.022.

3. Chung H.J., Colakoglu A.S., and Min D.B. Relationships among Headspace Oxygen, Peroxide Value, and Conjugated Diene Content of Soybean Oil Oxidation. Journale of Food Science, 2004, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 83-88. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.tb15507.x.

4. Trandafir I., Cosmulescu S., and Nour V. Phenolic Profile and Antioxidant Capacity of Walnut Extract as Influenced by the Extraction Method and Solvent. International Journal of Food Engineering, 2017, vol. 13, no. 1. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1515/ijfe-2015-0284.

5. Vidrih R., Hribar J., Solar A., and Zlati E. The Influence of Atmosphere on the Oxidation of Ground Walnut DuringStorage at 20°C. Food Technology Biotechnology, 2012, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 454-460.

6. Pathare P.B., Opara U.L., and Al-Said F.A.J. Color Measurement and Analysis in Fresh and Processed Foods: A Review. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 2013, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 36-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-012- 0867-9.

7. Nelson K.A. and Labuza T.P. Water activity and food polymer science: implications of state on Arrhenius and WLF models in predicting shelf life. Journal of Food Engineering, 1994, vol. 22, no. 1-4, pp. 271-289. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/0260-8774(94)90035-3.

8. Seyed M.A.R. and Taghizadeh M. The specific heat of pistachio nuts as affected by moisture content, temperature, and variety. Journal of Food Engineering, 2007, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 158-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfood- eng.2006.01.039.

9. Bayman P., Baker J.L., and Mahony N. Aspergillus on tree nuts: incidence and associations. Mycopathology, 2002, vol. 155, no. 3, pp. 161-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020419226146.

10. Christensen C.M. and Kaufmann H.H. Storage of cereal grains and their products. St. Paul, Minnesota, 1974. pp. 549.

11. Ferreira A.R.V., Bandarra N.M., Moldão-Martins M., Coelhoso I.M., and Alves V.D. FucoPol and chitosan bilay- er films for walnut kernels and oil preservation. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 2018, vol. 91, pp. 34-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.01.020.

12. Romanazzi G. Chitosan treatment for the control of postharvest decay of table grapes, strawberries and sweet cherries.Fresh Product, 2010, vol. 4, pp. 111-115.

13. Evandro L.D., Camila V.S., Carlos E.V.O., et al. Efficacy of a coating composed of chitosan from Mucor circinelloides and carvacrol to control Aspergillus flavus and the quality of cherry tomato fruits. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2015, vol. 6, pp.732. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00732.

14. Maghsudlou Y., Maghsudlou A., Khomiri M., and Ghorbani M. Antifungal and antioxidant activity analysis of chi- tosan coating and its effect on moisture absorption and organoleptic properties of pistachio cereals. Journal of Food Science and Nutrition, 2014, no. 1.

15. Campos-Requena V.H., Rivas B.L., P´erez M.A., Figueroa C.R., and Sanfuentes E.A. The synergistic antimicrobial effect of carvacrol and thymol in clay/polymer nanocomposite films over strawberry gray mold. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 2015, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 390-396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.06.006.

16. Ozcan M. and Chalchat J.C. Aroma profile of Thymus vulgaris L. growing wild in turkey. Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2004, vol. 30, no. 3-4, pp. 68-73.

17. Bourtoom T. Factor affecting the properties of edible film prepared from mung bean proteins. International Food Research Journal, 2008, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 167-180.

18. Brockgreitens J. and Abbas A. Responsive Food Packaging: Recent Progress and Technological Prospects. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 2016, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 3-15. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1111/1541-4337.12174.

19. Kuorwel K.K., Cran M.J., Orbell J.D., Buddhadasa S., and Bigger S.W. Review of Mechanical Properties, Migration, and Potential Applications in Active Food Packaging Systems Containing Nanoclays and Nanosilver. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 2015, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 411-430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1541- 4337.12139.

20. Badawy M.E.I. and Rabea E.I. A Biopolymer Chitosan and Its Derivatives as Promising Antimicrobial Agents against Plant Pathogens and Their Applications in Crop Protection. International Journal of Carbohydrate chemistry, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/460381.

21. Official Methods of Analysis. 19-th ed. USA, Arlington: AOAC International Publ., 2012.

22. Vanhanen L.P. and Savage G.P. The use of peroxide value as a measure of quality for walnut flour stored at five different temperatures using three different types of packaging. Food Chemistry, 2006, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 64-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.07.020.

23. American Oil Chemists’ Society. In: Firestone D. (ed) Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the AmericanOil Chemists’ Society, 5th ed. USA, Champaign: AOAC International Publ., 2003. 111 p.

24. Standard methods for the analysis of oils fats and derivatives. 1st supplement to 7th edition. Oxford: Pergamon Press Publ., 1992. 151 p.

25. Leahu A., Damian C., Oroian M., and Hretcanu C.-E. Estimation of biochemical properties of walnuts from the region of Suceava-Romania. Food and Environment Safety, 2013, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 169-175.

26. Bangyekan C., Aht-Ong D., and Srikulkit K. Preparation and properties evaluation of chitosan-coated cassava starchfilms. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2006, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 61-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.07.032.

27. Hong K.Q., Xie J.H., Zhang L.B., Sun D.Q., and Gong D.Q. Effects of chitosan coating on postharvest life and quality of guava (Psidium guajava L.) fruit during cold storage. Science Horticulture, 2012, vol. 144, pp. 172-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.07.002.

28. Siripatrawan U. and Harte B.R. Physical properties and antioxidant activity of an active film from chitosan incorpo- rated with green tea extract. Food Hydrocolloids, 2010, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 770-775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. foodhyd.2010.04.003.

29. Pires C., Ramos C., Teixeira G., et al. Characterization of biodegradable films prepared with hake proteins and thyme oil. Journal of Food Engineering, 2011, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 422-428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo- odeng.2011.02.036.

30. Ozdemir M. and Floros J.D. Active Food Packaging Technologies. Critical Reviews in Food Science Nutrition, 2004, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 185-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408690490441578.

31. Eliseeva L., Yurina O., and Hovhannisyan N. Nuts as raw material for confectionary industry. Annals of Agrarian Science, 2017, vol. 15, no. 1, pp.71-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aasci.2017.02.007.

32. Anraku M., Fujii T., Kondo Y., et al. Antioxidant properties of high molecular weight dietary chitosan in vitro and in vivo. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2011, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 501-505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.08.009.

33. Rajalakshmi A., Krithiga N., and Jayachitra A. Antioxidant activity of the chitosan extracted from shrimp exoskeleton. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 2013, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1446-1451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi. mejsr.2013.16.10.12033.

34. Baldwin E.A. and Wood B. Use of edible coating to preserve pecans at room temperature. HortScience, 2006, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 188-192.

35. Sabaghi M., Maghsoudlou Y., Khomeiri M., and Ziaiifar A.M. The effect of coating of chitosan incorporating and green tea extract on shelf life of walnut kernel. Journal of Research and Innovation in Food Science and Technology, 2014, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 361-374.

36. Yildirim S., Röcker B., Pettersen M.K., et al. Active Packaging Applications for Food. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 2018, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 165-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12322.

37. Vaidya B. and Eun J.B. Effect of roasting on oxidative and tocopherol stability of walnut oil during storage in the dark. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 2013, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 348-355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ ejlt.201200288.

38. Mexis S.F., Badeka A.V., and Kontominas M.G. Quality evaluation of raw ground almond kernels (Prunus dulcis): Ef- fect of active and modified atmosphere packaging, container oxygen barrier and storage conditions. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technology, 2009, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 580-589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2009.05.002.

39. Hill B., Roger T. and Vorhagen F.W. Comparative analysis of the quantization of color spaces on the basis of the CIELAB colordifference formula. Association for Computing Machinery Transactions on Graphics, 1997, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 109-154.

40. De Souza Vasconcelos L.C., Correia Sampaio M.C., Correia Sampaio F., and Higino J.S. Use of Punica grana- tum as an antifungal agent against candidosis associated with denture stomatitis. Mycoses, 2003, vol. 46, no. 5-6, pp. 192-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0507.2003.00884.x.

41. Ziani K., Ursua B., and Mate J.I. Application of bioactive coatings based on chitosan for artichoke seed protection.Crop Protection, 2010, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 853-859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2010.03.002.

42. Jin Z.T. and Gurtler J. Inactivation of Salmonella on tomato stem scars by edible chitosan and organic acid coatings.Journal of Food Protection, 2012, vol. 75, no. 8, pp. 1368-1372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-054.

43. Meng X., Yang L., Kennedy J.F., and Tian S. Effects of chitosan and oligochitosan on growth of two fungal pathogens and physiological properties in pear fruit. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2010, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 70-75. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.01.057.

44. Sharififar F., Moshafi M.H., Mansouri S.H., Khodashenas M., and Khoshnoodi M. In vitro evaluation of antibacterial and antioxidant activities of the essential oil and methanol extract of endemic Zataria multiflora. Food Control, 2007, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 800-805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2006.04.002.

45. Lee C.H., Park H.J., and Lee D.S. Influence of antimicrobial packaging on kinetics of spoilage microbial in milk and orange juice. Journal of Food Engineering, 2004, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 527-531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo- odeng.2004.02.016.

46. Kader A.A. and Watkins C.B. Modified atmosphere packaging - Toward 2000 and beyond. HortTechnology, 2000, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 483-486.

47. Frankel E.N. Review. Recent Advances in Lipid Oxidation. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1991, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 495-511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740540402.

48. Campaniello D., Bevilacqua A., Sinigaglia M., and Corbo M.R. Chitosan: Antimicrobial activity and potential ap- plications for preserving minimally processed strawberries. Food Microbiology, 2008, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 992-1000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2008.06.009.

49. Dong H., Cheng L., Tan J., Zheng K., and Jiang Y. Effects of chitosan coating on quality and shelf life of peeled litchi fruit. Journal Food Engineering, 2004, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 355-358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo- odeng.2003.11.003.


Login or Create
* Forgot password?