Kemerovo, Russian Federation
Barnaul, Russian Federation
A virtual dialogue in social networks is functionally parallel to a live one. The authors applied Dialogical Linguistics and Internet Linguistics to compare the substantive and structural features of a virtual dialogue in social networks with an oral live dialogue. The research objective was to identify and describe the invariant and variable features of a virtual dialogue and a live one. The virtual dialogue in the VKontakte social network was represented by an open public dialogue, an open anonymous dialogue, and an open personified dialogue. They were obtained from posts and comments in the public Anonymous; posts and comments on the public page Vesti; posts and comments on personal home pages of native Russian speakers. The samples of live conversations came from the collection of The Living Speech of an Ural City (1995). The analysis parameters included the image of the addressee, the initial conversational turns, the modes of dialogue management, and the methods of structural organization. The analysis yielded a substantive and structural typology of a virtual dialogue in social networks.
virtual dialogue, oral dialogue, social networking sites, image of addressee, initial communicative turns, modes of dialogue management, methods of dialogue structural organization
1. Altuhova T. V. Correlation of elements of oral and written speech in virtual communication. Siberian Journal of Philology, 2012, (1): 150–154. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/owhddp
2. Altukhova T. A., Buldyaeva V. V., Bushuev A. B. et al. Social networking websites: Comprehensive linguistic analysis. Kemerovo: KemSU, 2021, vol. 1, 430. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/kegpiu
3. Afinogenova V. A., Pavlova N. D. Intentions of communication subjects in an everyday dialogue. Cherepovets State University Bulletin, 2012, (2-2): 198–201. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pcdhlv
4. Baikulova A. N. Oral informal communication and its varieties: Everyday speech of urban dwellers. Saratov: Nauka, 2014, 216. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/udictr
5. Balayan A. R. Functional-linguistic study of a dialogue. Izvestiia AN SSSR. Seriia literatury i iazyka, 1971, 30(4): 325–331. (In Russ.)
6. Baranov A. N., Kreydlin G. E. Illocutionary compulsion in the structure of a dialogue. Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 1992, (2): 84–99. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ogjrpf
7. Bobyreva E. V. Semantics and pragmatics of initial and final cues of a dialogue. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Volgograd, 1996, 22. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ktscwd
8. Borisova I. N. Russian conversational dialogue. Moscow: URSS, 2009, 320. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qufevn
9. Bushev A. B., Gnedash A. A., Golev N. D. et al. Social networking websites: Comprehensive linguistic analysis. Kemerovo: KemSU, 2022, vol. 3, 384. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pkdffr
10. Vorontsova T. A., Patrusheva L. S. Sociolect formation on the internet communication. Philological Class, 2018, (3): 60–66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26710/fk18-03-09
11. Golev N. D. Russian colloquial written speech and the reflection of its modern state in the ordinary metalanguage consciousness of virtual communication participants. Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 2013, (5): 12–30. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rejvcv
12. Golev N. D., Altukhova T. A., Butakova L. O. et al. Social networking websites: Comprehensive linguistic analysis. Kemerovo: KemSU, 2021, vol. 2, 300. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/nqbyei
13. Golev N. D., Lebedeva N. B., Khalina N. V., Murzin L. N., Karpukhina V. A., Chernyshova T. V., Chuvakin A. A., Brinev K. I., Trubnikova Yu. V. Essays on linguistic determinology and derivatology of the Russian language. Barnaul: ASU, 1998, 252. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rkvxnz
14. Golev N. D., Sushkina M. A. Centrifugal trend in news comments in social networks. Virtual Communication and Social Networks, 2023, 2(1): 1–6. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-4799-2023-2-1-1-6
15. Demyankov V. Z. The image of the addressee. The culture of Russian speech, ed. Ivanov L. Yu. Moscow: Flinta, 2003, 376–377. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/scegep
16. Dudareva Ya. A., Shpilnaya N. N. Comment on social networking sites as a result of dialogization (based on the material of internet comments on vaccination against COVID-19). Political Linguistics, 2021, (6): 54–64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26170/1999-2629_2021_06_06
17. Kolokoltseva T. N. Dialogue and dialogicity in Internet communication. Ivzestia of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University, 2011, (8): 128–133. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ooarsb
18. Krylova M. N. Language of modern internet communication (on the material of the intellectual content of the social network "VKontakte"). Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics, 2019, (1): 128–137. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2019-1-128-137
19. Matusevich A. A. Communication in social networking websites: Pragmatic, communicative, and stylistic aspects. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Nizhny Novgorod, 2017, 190. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/txzken
20. Mikhailov L. M. Grammar of German dialogic speech. Moscow: Vysch. shk., 1986, 110. (In Russ.)
21. Orgoňová O., Kozharnovich M. P. Dialogue in Slovak social networks. Media Linguistics, 2022, 9(3): 237–253. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu22.2022.305
22. Paducheva E. V. Pragmatic aspects of the coherence of a dialogue. Izvestiia AN SSSR. Seriia literatury i iazyka, 1982, 41(4): 305–313. (In Russ.)
23. Prom N. A. Types of addressee in media discourse. Media Linguistics, 2020, 7(1): 95–103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu22.2020.108
24. Samoilenko L. V. Electronic dialogue as a special type of pragmatic relations of chat communicants. Vestnik of Astrakhan State Technical University, 2015, (2): 94–101. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vatwrf
25. Smetyuk I. N. Dialogic text: Communicative and linguistic aspects in English and Russian. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Perm, 1994, 20. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zjgnal
26. Formanovskaya N. I. Addressee in linguistic communication. In: Formanovskaya N. I. Selected articles from different years: Anniversary collection. Moscow: Pushkin Institute, 2007, 72–84. (In Russ.)
27. Chesnokova L. V. Blurring the line between publicity and privacy in social media and the privacy paradox. Philosophical Problems of Information Technology and Cyberspace, 2021, (2): 22–38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17726/philIT.2021.2.2
28. Shvedova N. Yu. Essays on the syntax of Russian colloquial speech. Moscow: AS SSSR, 1960, 377. (In Russ.)
29. Shpilnaya N. N. Turn-taking: The second conversational turn and metalanguage dialogue operators (based on dialogical internet formats). Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 2021, (71): 185–200. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/19986645/71/11
30. Engel E. A. Communicative dynamism of everyday dialogue: Theoretical and experimental research in German. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Abstr. Moscow, 2002, 208. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qdqeyl
31. Bronwen E. T. "It’s good to talk"? An analysis of a telephone conversation from Evelyn Waugh’s Vile Bodies. Language and Literature, 1997, 6(2): 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709700600202
32. Goodwin C., Heritage J. Conversation analysis. Annual review of anthropology, 1990, 19(1): 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435
33. Westerman M. A. Conversation analysis and interpretive quantitative research on psychotherapy process and problematic interpersonal behavior. Theory & Psychology, 2011, 21(2): 155–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354310394719
