Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Latent cognitive dissonance in Internet disputers manifests itself as a conflict of text interpretations. This cognitive interpretation process of pre-textual cognitive dissonance often results in aggressive comments. The author analyzed interpretive Internet texts (comments) to reveal the cognitive patterns and prove the effect of pre-textual, i.e., cognitive, dissonance on the language and content of Internet comments. Addressee's external interpretive activity, represented in the text, is determined by internal cognitive processes, i.e., pre-textual presumptions and expectations. The study was based on the article entitled The people are multiplying "on earth", which was posted on a Runet information network resource on January 30, 2023. The article, which featured national demographic problems and possible solutions, yielded 189 comments that clearly illustrated the mechanism of conflict of interpretations. The methods of content and intent analyses revealed two cognitive patterns: the first one correlated with the intentional content of the trigger-text whereas the second pattern did not. Both patterns covered a number of cognitive models. The original text, subjectively interpreted by the addressee, triggered a wide range of comments that followed various cognitive patterns. As a result, the discussion unfolded as a conflict scenario, i.e., a struggle of attitudes and opinions, determined by the pre-textual cognitive dissonance of the disputers.

interpretive linguistics, addressee-centric aspect, conflict of interpretations, cognitive dissonance, cognitive model, Internet comments
Publication text (PDF): Read Download

1. Golev N. D. Social networks as an actual object of interdisciplinary scientific study. Social networks: complex linguistic analysis, eds. Golev N. D., Kim L. G. Kemerovo: KemSU, 2021, vol. 1, 5–9. (In Russ.)]

2. Golev N. D., Kim L. G. Dictum-modus pluralism in virtual dialogic discourse (based on Internet comments). Media Linguistics, 2023, 10(1): 4–26. (In Russ.)]

3. Golev N. D., Kim L. G. On the relationship of an addressee, author and text in the paradigm of linguistic interpretationism. Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal, 2008, (1): 144–153. (In Russ.)]

4. Demyankov V. Z. Dominating linguistic theories at the end of the 20th century. Language and science at the end of 20th century. Moscow: IL RAS, 1995, 239–320. (In Russ.)]

5. Demyankov V. Z. Cognitive linguistics as a variety of interpretive approach. Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 1994, (4): 17–33. (In Russ.)]

6. Demyankov V. Z. Conventions, rules and communication strategies (interpretive approach to argumentation). Izvestiya AN SSSR. Seriya literatury i yazyka, 1982, 41(4): 327–337. (In Russ.)]

7. Ivanenko G. S. The dialectic of conflict in the social network. Fundamental linguistics and problems of forensic examination: social networks as an object of scientific and expert analysis: Proc. Intern. Sci. Conf., Moscow, 5–6 Oct 2021. Moscow: Pushkin Institute, 2022, 348–353. (In Russ.)]

8. Kim L. G. Variative-interpretative functioning of the text in the paradigm of general variantology. Variational-interpretative functioning of the text. 3rd ed. Kemerovo: KemSU, 2013, 28–57. (In Russ.)]

9. Kolokoltseva T. N. Dialog vs dialogicity in Internet communication. Internet communication as a new speech formation, eds. Kolokoltseva T. N., Lutovinova O. V. 4th ed. Moscow: FLINTA; Nauka, 2018, 139–157. (In Russ.)]

10. Mityagina V. A. Internet comment as a communicative action. Genres and types of text in scientific and media discourse, ed. Pastukhov A. G. Orel: OSIAC, 2012, iss. 10, 188–197. (In Russ.)]

11. Ricoeur P. The conflict of interpretations: essays in hermeneutics. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2008, 695. (In Russ.)]

12. Golev N. D., Kim L. G., Saveleva I. V. Variability of news interpretation in political discourse (a case study of the Internet materials covering the 2014 and 2018 Winter Olympic Games). Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2021, 14(4): 568–583.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?