employee from 01.01.2021 until now
Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
This article provides qualitative and quantitative data to establish the effectiveness of virtual tools as a means of developing intercultural competence in students of international relations at foreign language classes. Intercultural competence is known to be crucial for this field of studies. However, no teaching technologies exist for its development at foreign language classes, and available research publications on this issue fail to take into account the current state and mechanisms of global communication. The empirical part of this study involved a survey of students of international relations during the first term of 2021–2022. The author compared their performance in class and during extracurricular activities, where they had to maintain an English blog. A total of 93 second- and third-year students (experimental + control groups) took part in the trial training, and 50 people (28 students, 22 teachers) participated in the independent assessment of the technology. The blog operating process was divided according to types of virtual intercultural communication (oral-written, mixed, and oral) and followed the academic program. The independent assessment was performed by academic staff and students who didn't participate in the experiment, but were able to observe. They unanimously approved of the new technology and defined the prospects of its further implementation. Blogging in a foreign language proved to be an efficient technology for developing intercultural competence in university students majoring in international relations.
teaching techniques, virtual reality, international relations, cross-cultural competence, intercultural communication, foreign language
1. Yurchenko M. A. Prospects of a polylingual approach in language training. Linguistics, translation, and intercultural communication: Proc. XXI Sci.-Prac. Conf., Ekaterinburg, 21-22 Nov 2019. Ekaterinburg: Alfa Print, 2020, 119-122. (In Russ.)
2. Yurchenko M. A. The pedagogical challenge of intercultural competence development in the post-COVID era. Actual aspects of air traffic development (Aviatrans-2021): Proc. Sci.-Prac. Conf. with Intern. Participation, Rostov-on-Don, 20-27 Oct 2021. Rostov-on-Don: Rostov branch of MSTUCA, 2021, 123-128. (In Russ.)
3. Siraena M. N. Intercultural communication in teaching foreign languages: historical background and prospects. Creating an artificial foreign language environment to enhance academic activities: Proc. All-Russian Sci.-Prac. Conf. with Intern. Participation, St. Petersburg, 27 Oct 2014. St. Petersburg: SPbSUE, 2014, 14-17. (In Russ.)
4. Gusakova N. L., Ogneva E. A., Boichuk I. V. Linguo-cultural aspects of cross-cultural communication. Russian Linguistic Bulletin, 2017, (2): 9-11. https://doi.org/10.18454/RULB.10.13
5. Munnix G. Is the international communication possible? On the importance of an appropriate translation in the world of global relations. Vek globalizatsii, 2021, (1): 59-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30884/vglob/2021.01.05
6. Delanoy W. Quo vadis (inter-)kulturelle bildung? Internationalisierung des Lehramtsstudiums. Paderborn: Brill; Schöningh, 2018, 35-55. https://doi.org/10.30965/9783657728459_004
7. Schneider-Wohlfahrt U., Pfänder B., Pfänder P., Schmidt B. Fremdheit üeberwinden: theorie und praxis des interkulturellen lernens in der erwachsenenbildung. Opladen: Leske + Budrich, 1990, 268. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97205-7
8. Gazilov M. G. On the issue of gender approach in teaching a foreign language. Aktualnye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk, 2016, (1-4): 17-20. (In Russ.)
9. Kharchenkova L. I. Dialogue of cultures in teaching Russian as a foreign language. St. Petersburg: Sudarynia, 1994, 142. (In Russ.)
10. Knapp A. Interkulturelle kompetenz: eine sprachwissenschaftliche perspektive. Interkulturelle kompetenz und pädagogische professionalität, ed. Auernheimer G. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2008, 81-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92198-3_5
11. Fischer G. E-mail in foreign language teaching: towards the creation of virtual classrooms. Tübingen: Stauffenburg, 1998, 205.
12. Safonova V. V. Sociocultural approach to teaching foreign languages. Moscow: Vysshaia shkola; Amskort interneshnl, 1991, 311. (In Russ.)
13. Kuznetsova A. A., Furmanova V. P. Cross-cultural competence as a means of adaptation in foreign language environment. XLIX Ogarev readings: Proc. Sci. Conf., Saransk, 7-13 Dec 2020. Saransk: Ogarev MSU, 2021, pt. 3, 339-343. (In Russ.)
14. Vereshchagin E. M., Kostomarov V. G. Language and culture. Moscow: Indrik, 2005, 1040. (In Russ.)
15. Sterck G. de. Review of Buttjes, Dieter & Michael Byram, eds. (1991) Mediating languages and cultures: towards an intercultural theory of foreign language education. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1993, 99(1): 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.99-100.11des
16. Spitzberg B. H., Changnon G. Conceptualizing intercultural competence. The SAGE handbook of intercultural competence, ed. Deardorff D. K. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2009, 2-52. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781071872987.n1
17. Samovar L. A., Porter R. E. Understanding intercultural communication: an introduction and overview. Intercultural communication: a reader. 10th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; Thomson Learning, 2003, 6-17.
18. Galskova N. D., Gez N. I. Theory of teaching foreign languages. Linguadidactics and methodology. 6th ed. Moscow: Akademiia, 2009, 336. (In Russ.)
19. Alekseeva M. P. The method of telecommunication projects as a basis for the formation of intercultural communicative competence of students. Municipal education: innovation and experiment, 2009, (3): 50-52. (In Russ.)
20. Elizarova G. V. Culture and foreign language teaching. St. Petersburg: KARO, 2005, 352. (In Russ.)
21. Larina T. V. Basics of intercultural communication. Moscow: Akademiia, 2017, 192. (In Russ.)
22. Soloveva I. S., Danilov D. A. Introduction of integration into the process of teaching a foreign language in high school. Nauka i obrazovanie, 2006, (4): 133-136. (In Russ.)
23. Yakovleva T. A. The problems of intercultural communication on the example of greeting forms peculiarities in Austria and Germany. Concept: Philosophy, Religion, Culture, 2017, (4): 153-160. (In Russ.)
24. Drygina M. V. On the development of intercultural competence when using mobile technologies in teaching a foreign language. Science and world, 2019, (3-3): 19-24. (In Russ.)
25. Imnadze E. L'intégration de technologies numériques dans l'enseignement / apprentissages des langues / cultures étrangères. Etudes Interdisciplinaires en Sciences humaines, 2018, (5): 113-123.
26. Betretdinova I. K. Teaching virtual written communication as part of the development of students' writing skills. Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 2019, (1): 177-180. (In Russ.).
27. Zimniaia I. A. Pedagogical psychology. 2nd ed. Moscow: Logos, 2000, 384. (In Russ.)
28. Geykhman L. K., Stavtseva I. V. Cross-cultural communication: real and virtual aspects. Proceedings of the Saint-Petersburg State University of Culture, 2016, 214, 64-67. (In Russ.)
29. Apetian M. K. Peculiarities of virtual communication. Molodoi uchenyi, 2015, (3): 939-941. (In Russ.)
30. Geykhman L. K., Belkina O. V., Galanova S. Yu., Stavtseva I. V. Cross-cultural communication: traditions and innovations. Destiny of national cultures in the context of globalization: Proc. II Intern. Sci. Conf., Chelyabinsk, 4-5 Apr 2013. Chelyabinsk: Entsiklopediia, 2013, vol. 1, 269-273. (In Russ.)
