GENDER DIFFERENCES IN BUSINESS STRUCTURES OPERATING IN TRADE, INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION SERVICES
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The article is devoted to the assessment of the creation of new businesses in trade and information and communication sphere. Gender differences in entrepreneurial activity by country are considered. The study examined the specifics of the activities of entrepreneurs engaged in services in such sectors as trade and information and communication services for institutions and organizations, as well as private clients. At the same time, the principles and concepts of the existing development of the sectoral structure of entrepreneurship were taken into account. The implementation of the study consisted of five stages. The information base included the results of questionnaire surveys of respondents-entrepreneurs in 59 states when monitoring the activities of entrepreneurs in 2018. In the course of economic and mathematical modeling, six models were developed that reflect the distribution of the following indicators across the subjects of Russia: the proportion of women and men who have created businesses in trade, in the total number of women and men who have started entrepreneurial activity; the share of women and men who have created businesses in the information and communication sphere in the total number of women and men who have started entrepreneurial activities. In addition, the ratios of specific weights describing the provision of services by women entrepreneurs and men entrepreneurs in the trade sector and the information and communication sphere are calculated. For each of the 59 countries, it was determined whether there is an excess of the values of indicators that characterize the corresponding specific weights of male entrepreneurs and female entrepreneurs. For most countries, these values differed significantly, which indicates gender gaps. In addition, the States with the maximum and minimum values of the indices under consideration were identified. The analysis was carried out, which made it possible to compare the obtained average values with the data reflecting the indicators of Russian entrepreneurs. The share of female entrepreneurs in trade is higher than the share of male entrepreneurs. The share of male entrepreneurs in the field of information and communication services is twice as high as the share of female entrepreneurs. The results of the work can be applied in the development of forecasts for the development of trade and information and communication services in the future.

Keywords:
entrepreneurship, wholesale trade, retail trade, information and communication services, women entrepreneurs, men entrepreneurs
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Decker R., Haltiwanger J., Jarmin R., Miranda J. The role of entrepreneurship in US job creation and economic dynamism. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2014, 28(3): 3-24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.3.3

2. Simón-Moya V., Revuelto-Taboada L., Ribeiro-Soriano D. Influence of economic crisis on new SME survival: reality or fiction? Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 2016, 28(1-2): 157-176. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1118560

3. Tomovska Misoska A., Dimitrova M., Mrsik J. Drivers of entrepreneurial intentions among business students in Macedonia. Economic Research - Ekonomska Istraživanja, 2016, 29(1): 1062-1074. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2016.1211956

4. Borbás L. The role of SMEs in the European entrepreneurship policy. Volume of Management, Enterprise and Benchmarking in the 21st Century II, ed. Michelberger P. Budapest: Óbuda University, 2015, 71-88.

5. Zahra S., Wright M. Understanding the social role of entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies, 2016, 53(4): 610-629. DOI: 1111/joms.12149

6. Radas S., Božić L. The antecedents of SME innovativeness in an emerging transition economy. Technovation, 2009, 29(6-7): 438-450. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.12.002

7. Zygmunt A. Innovation activities of Polish firms. Multivariate analysis of the moderate innovator countries. Oeconomia Copernicana, 2017, 8(4): 505-521. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.v8i4.31

8. Dettmer B. Trade effects of the European Union's Service Directive: contrasting ex ante estimates with empirical evidence. The World Economy, 2015, 38(3): 445-478. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12149

9. Neirotti P., Raguseo E., Paolucci E. How SMEs develop ICT-based capabilities in response to their environment: past evidence and implications for the uptake of the new ICT paradigm. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 2018, 31(1): 10-37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2016-0158

10. Afolayan A., Plant E., White G. R. T., Jones P., Beynon-Davies P. Information technology usage in SMEs in a developing economy. Strategic Change, 2015, 24(5): 483-498. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2023

11. Chhabra M., Karmarkar Y. Gender gap in entrepreneurship - a study of small and micro enterprises. ZENITH International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2016, 6(8): 82-99.

12. Grosser K., Moon J. CSR and feminist organization studies: towards an integrated theorization for the analysis of gender issues. Journal of Business Ethics, 2019, 155(2): 321-342. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3510-x

13. Sperber S., Linder C. Gender-specifics in startup strategies and the role of the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 2018, 53(2): 533-546. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-9999-2

14. Chazireni B., Kader A. The impact of CSR on the sustainable growth of wholesale and retail SMEs: the case of eThekwini municipal region. Expert Journal of Business and Management, 2019, 7(2): 221-229.

15. De Massis A., Kotlar J., Wright M., Kellermanns F. W. Sector-based entrepreneurial capabilities and the promise of sector studies in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2018, 42(1): 3-23. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717740548

16. Mijić K., Nuševa D., Jakšić D. The determinants of SMEs profitability in the wholesale and retail sector in Serbia. TEME, 2018, XLII(1): 97-111. DOI:https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME1801097M

17. Dey B., Ali F. A critical review of the ICT for development research. ICTs in Developing Countries, eds. Dey B., Sorour K., Filieri R. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016, 3-23. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137469502_1

18. Theis T. N., Horn P. M. Basic research in the information technology industry. Physics Today, 2003, 56(7): 44-49. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1603079

19. Hanna N. K., Qiang C. Z.-W. China's emerging informatization strategy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2010, 1(2): 128-164. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-009-0001-z

20. López-Nicolás C., Solo-Acosta P. Analyzing ICT adoption and use effects on knowledge creation: an empirical investigation in SMEs. International Journal of Information Management, 2010, 30(6): 521-528. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.03.004

21. Cramer H. Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962, 590.

22. Jenish N., Prucha I. R. Central limit theorems and uniform laws of large numbers for arrays of random fields. Journal of Econometrics, 2009, 150(1): 86-98. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2009.02.009

23. Heinhold I., Gaede K. W. Ingenieur statistik. München-Wien: R. Oldenbourg Verlag, 1972, 388.

24. Pinkovetskaia Iu. S., Slepova V. Estimation of fixed capital investment in SMEs: the existing differentiation in the Russian Federation. Business Systems Research, 2018, 9(1): 65-78. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2018-0006

25. Pinkovetskaia Iu. S. Analysis of trends and development forecast of small enterprises in Russia. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2012, (3): 92-106. (In Russ.)


Login or Create
* Forgot password?