Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The specifics of research and academic profession presuppose special approaches to personnel management and motivation. The selection of adequate motivational tools is often done by trial and error. The paper attempts to substantiate short-term and long-term methods of motivating scientific personnel. The experiment featured the case of a Russian biotechnological company, whose personnel underwent S. Ritchie and P. Martin’s Motivational Profile Test. The dominant factors of job satisfaction included self-development opportunities, recognition, ambitious goals, creative tasks, etc. The authors developed some ways for the further development of methods for motivating research personnel.

Keywords:
motivation, human resource, research staff, motivational factor, material motivation, intangible motivation, employer attractiveness
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Samarina Yu. S., Shkvarova A. S. Researchers' work: are work measurement techniques applicable? Science. Innovation. Education, 2017, 12(3): 61-75. (In Russ.)

2. Jindal-Snape D., Snape J. B. Motivation of scientists in a government research institute: scientists' perceptions and the role of management. Management Decision, 2006, 44(10): 1325-1343. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740610715678

3. Komkov N. I. The role of innovations and technologies in the development of the economy and society. Problemy prognozirovaniia, 2003, (3): 24-43. (In Russ.)

4. Heckhausen H. Motivation und Handeln, tr. Gudkova T. A., eds. Leontev D. A., Velichkovskii B. M., 2nd ed. St. Petersburg: Piter; Moscow: Smysl, 2003, 859. (In Russ.)

5. Pelz D. C., Andrews F. M. Scientists in Organizations: Productive Climates for Research and Development, tr. Maltser R. E., eds. Gvishiani D. M., Mikulinskii S. R., Iaroshevskii M. G. Moscow: Progress, 1973, 471. (In Russ.)

6. Dohmen T. J., Falk A. Performance pay and multidimensional sorting: productivity, preferences, and gender. American Economic Review, 2011, 101(2): 556-590. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.2.556

7. Vasilyeva E. V. Far eastern scientific motivation for research work under reinstitutionalization of national science. Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologiy, 2011, 2 (1): 25-46. (In Russ.)

8. Zubova L. G. Professional activity of Russian scientists: values and motivations. Vestnik RAN. 1998. T. 68. No. 9. 775-789. (In Russ.)

9. Ogorodova T. V., Medvedeva Yu. S. Motivational structures of scientific activity subjects. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2013, (26): 77-80. (In Russ.)

10. Dmitrieva O. M. Problems of strengthening of motivation of work of scientific and technical workers of the oil company. Quality. Innovations. Education, 2008, (7): 47-51. (In Russ.)

11. Ritchie Sh., Martin P. Motivation management, tr. Lalaian E. E.; ed. Klimova E. A. Moscow: INITI-Dana, 2015, 399. (In Russ.)

12. Izgalieva K. S., Kokhno P. A. Management of the cost of scientific researches and development in the conditions of motivation. Nauchnyi vestnik oboronno-promyshlennogo kompleksa Rossii, 2017, (1): 80-93. (In Russ.)

13. Potapov Ia. O. Grading as an effective tool for managing the career of employees. Vserossiiskii zhurnal nauchnykh publikatsii, 2012, (2): 32-33. (In Russ.)

14. Goodhart C. A. E. Problems of monetary management: the UK experience. Papers in monetary economics. Sydney: Reserve Bank of Australia, 1975, 1: 1-20.

15. Muller J. Z. The Tyranny of Metrics. Moscow: Alpina Pablisher, 2019, 265. (In Russ.)

16. Ryan J. C. The work motivation of research scientists and its effect on research performance. R&D Management, 2014, 44(4): 355-369. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12063


Login or Create
* Forgot password?