Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The present research featured the legal nature of the negatory action as one of the common ways to protect the rights of a real estate owner. The article focuses on the ground of this action and the fact in proof in property rights protection cases not related to dispossession. The authors drew a parallel between the negatory action and the prohibitory action which prohibits offensive activities or hazards of injury infliction. In spite of the fact that the prohibitory action used to be associated with the nugatory one, they demand different kinds of actual statutory regulation and law enforcement. The authors agree that the lawsuit on the prohibition of activities, as provided for by Article 1065 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, stems from a tort, and is not a proprietary method of defense of rights. In the Russian civil law, the law of neighboring tenements remains underdeveloped, as does the defense of rights of the real estate owner from their neighbors. The authors believe that it is wrong to justify the negatory action by administrative law as this violates the rules for overcoming conflicts of legal regulation, shifting the burden of proof, and deviating from the standards of adversarial and equal rights of the parties in the civil process.

negatory action, prohibitory action, neighborhood legal relations, proprietary legal remedies, property law, real estate, class action
Publication text (PDF): Read Download

1. Sagdeeva L. V. Negatory claims and demands to suppress actions violating rights or posing a threat of violation of rights. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava, 2020, (2): 85-93. (In Russ.) DOI:https://doi.org/10.12737/jrl.2020.019

2. Sukhanov E. A. Property law: a scientific and educational essay. Moscow: Statut, 2017, 559. (In Russ.)

3. Andreev Iu. N. Neighboring relations in the civil law of Russia: theory and practice. Moscow: NORMA; INFRA-M, 2016, 206. (In Russ.)

4. Beliaeva O. A., Bogatyrev F. O., Braginskii M. I. Ownership: current issues. Moscow: Statut, 2008, 729. (In Russ.)

5. Chubarov V. V. Problems of legal regulation of real estate. Moscow: Statut, 2006, 333. (In Russ.)

6. Podshivalov T. P. Negatory claim: problems of theory and practice. Moscow: Infotropik Media, 2019, 340. (In Russ.)

7. Latyev A. N. "The apiary case" as a mirror of the poverty of Russian property law. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiia Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2019, (11): 6-19. (In Russ.)

8. Claims and court decisions, ed. Rozhkova M. A. Moscow: Statut, 2009, 363. (In Russ.)

9. Bobrova M. V. Adequacy and its impact on the dynamics of tort obligations. Cand. Jurispr. Sci. Diss. Tomsk, 2015, 233. (In Russ.)

10. Commentary on the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Part two (itemized), ed. Sergeev A. P. Moscow: Prospekt, 2010, 986. (In Russ.)

11. Vitrianskii V. V., Em V. S., Kozlova N. V. Russian civil law. Vol. 2: Law of obligations, 2nd ed. Moscow: Statut, 2011, 1206. (In Russ.)

12. Usacheva K. A. Negative lawsuit in the historical and comparative legal perspective (beginning). Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava, 2013, 13(5): 87-119. (In Russ.)

13. Sklovskii K. I. Property in civil law, 5th ed. Moscow: Statut, 2010, 891. (In Russ.)

14. Liushnia A. V. Protective capabilities of the negatory action. Zakon, 2007, (2): 141-150. (In Russ.)

15. Sklovskii K. I. Application of property law. Difficult issues. Moscow: Statut, 2016, 205. (In Russ.)

16. Cherepakhin B. B. Civil law proceedings. Moscow: Statut, 2001, 476. (In Russ.)

17. Gutnikov O. V. Corporate liability in civil law. Moscow: IZiSP, Kontract, 2019, 487. (In Russ.)

18. Dobrovinskaya A. V. About measures of civil liability for competition legislation violations. Zhurnal predprinimatelskogo i korporativnogo prava, 2019, (3): 54-59. (In Russ.)

19. Ershov O. G. Requirement to ban construction in connection with the hazard of injury infliction: a measure of protection or a measure of responsibility? Pravovye voprosy stroitelstva, 2012, (1): 3-7. (In Russ.)

20. An article-by-article commentary on the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, part two, ed. Krasheninnikov P. V. Moscow: Statut, 2011, vol. 3, 574. (In Russ.)

21. The principles of private law, eds. Podshivalov T. P., Kvanina V. V., Sagandykov M. S. Moscow: Prospekt, 2018, 400. (In Russ.)

Login or Create
* Forgot password?