Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The author reveals the economic essence of the compensation package and its structure on the basis of the cost approach, which underlies the justification of the cost and the price of the created product. Costs associated with labor are its integral part. The article analyzes the definitions of such concepts as "compensation" and "compensation package" given by the authors of different scientific schools and directions. It also features the principles of formation of compensation package and its functions. When examining the essence of the compensation package, most scientists focus only on its volume component, which does not reveal the economic nature of this category. The compensation package from the position of the cost approach is defined as the converted form of cost (price) of all expenses of the employee incurred by him or her in the course of performance of functional duties according to the employment contract. The possibility of establishing the dependence of the volume and structure of the compensation package on the quality of human capital and the labor results of a specific employee allows the employer to use it as a powerful tool for motivating the personnel of the organization. The compensation package, as a complex multifunctional incentive, makes it possible for the employer to form the structure of the organization's personnel based on its strategic goals and the current tasks arising from them, to attract and retain valuable employees, as well as to increase the loyalty of the staff and motivate them to highly effective work.

compensation, compensation package structure, the functional role of compensation, remuneration, motivation, personnel management
Publication text (PDF): Read Download

1. Badmaev A. V. Compensation package as a tool for the implementation of a comprehensive staff development policy. Motivatsiia i oplata truda, 2018, (1): 10-20. (In Russ.)

2. Babina S. I. Compensation policy in a new paradigm of human resources management of the company. Journal of Creative Economy, 2017, 11(2): 201-212. (In Russ.)

3. Kiselyova E. A. Salary package: to definition to the term. Izvestiia Irkutskoi gosudarstvennoi ekonomicheskoi akademii, 2013, (3): 19. (In Russ.)

4. Daniliuk A. A. Compensation management. Tyumen: Izd-vo Tiumenskogo gos. un-ta, 2015, 256. (In Russ.)

5. Eremeev M. A. Study of linear dependence of compensation package components. Vestnik of Saratov State Socio-Economic University, 2010, (1): 83-86. (In Russ.)

6. Sosnovyi A. A. Compensation package: content, structure, features of creation. Moskovskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2004, (8): 61-67. (In Russ.)

7. Levchenko A. P. Social and compensational packages: correlation of instruments of enterprise's social policy. Vestnik of Saratov State Technical University, 2009, 3(1): 194-200. (In Russ.)

8. Ivanenko L. V., Panina E. S. Regularities of definition of basic parameters of compensating policy of an organization. Osnovy ekonomiki upravleniia i prava, 2012, (6): 117-124. (In Russ.)

9. Zelenskaia L. M. Comparative analysis of forms and systems of wages. Vestnik Cheliabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2010, (2): 29-33. (In Russ.)

10. Savenok E. S. The role of non-material incentives in the structure of the compensation package of the organization. Factors of development of the Russian economy: Proc. IX Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf. Tver: Izd-vo Tverskogo gos. un-ta, 2017, 68-71. (In Russ.)

11. Povarich I. P., Babin S. A. Main concepts and structure of enterprise's compensation policy. Tomsk State University Journal, 2010, (334): 119-124. (In Russ.)

12. Martynova T. N., Sgibneva O. V. Guarantee and compensation payments to employees in labour law of the Russian Federation: the problems of terminology. Vestnik of Kostroma State University, 2016, 22(3): 241-244. (In Russ.)

13. Babina S. I. Management of the compensation policy of the modern organization. Managing change in modern companies, eds. Nizhegorodtsev R. M., Reznik S. D. Moscow: INFRA-M, 2018, 76-93. (In Russ.)

14. Kiselyova E. A. Comparative analysis of structures of benefits and guaranteed benefits packages. Izvestiya Uralskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta, 2015, (2): 127-135. (In Russ.)

15. Talisheva J. N., Babynina L. S. Compensation package: structure and motivation during the crisis. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Economy and Management Communication, 2009, (1): 53-57. (In Russ.)

16. Fedchenko A. A. Compensation paek of the organization: the ways to its building. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Economy and Management Communication, 2008, (1): 114-122. (In Russ.)

17. Povarich I. P., Babin S. A., Babina S. I. Development and implementation of the compensation policy of the organization. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal eksperimentalnogo obrazovaniia, 2011, (9): 86-87. (In Russ.)

18. Babina S. I. Structural-logical relationships in the basic categories of the theory of compensation. Journal of Economy and entrepreneurship, 2017, (1): 914-920. (In Russ.)

Login or Create
* Forgot password?