Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Akademiya upravleniya MVD Rossii
Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
In criminal proceedings, oaths traditionally guaranteed the reliability and true intentions of court participants, including responsible attitude to their duties and the truthfulness and objectivity of the information they provided. However, they are absent from the modern criminal proceedings. The Russian Empire employed oaths as part of criminal proceedings and trials, but the early Soviet criminal justice system denied any religious rites in the activities of state bodies and replaced oaths with criminal liability warnings, i.e., a penal notice, to witnesses, experts, and other participants. Today, such warnings seem poorly consistent with the principle of presumption of knowledge of the criminal law. Yet, the pre-revolutionary religious oaths cannot be fully restored. However, the practice of using identical oaths has a very high preventive potential, which exceeds that of penal notice. If modified and secularized, such legal guarantees may find their way back to the sphere of criminal proceedings and trials. As for criminal liability warnings and penal notices, they should be the category of discretionary powers of inquiries, investigators, and judges to be used for tactical purposes at their own discretion.
giving knowingly false testimony, knowingly false expert opinion, refusal to testify, witness signature, expert signature, warning of criminal liability, oath, judicial oath
1. Golunskiy S. A. The right to justice. Moscow: Institute of State and Law of the RAS, 2024, 608. (In Russ.)
2. Polyanskiy N. N. Questions of the theory of soviet criminal procedure. Moscow: Moscow University, 1956, 271. (In Russ.)
3. Chuchaev A. I. Development of criminal law legislation in the XVIII – first quarter of the XIX century: The struggle for the identity of Russian law. State and Law, 2024, (12): 172–185. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S1026945224120168
4. Chuchaev A. I., Rossinskiy S. B. The charter of criminal procedure of the RSFSR of 1918: Lessons of history. Works of the Institute of State and Law of the RAS, 2023, 18(6): 160–175. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35427/2073-4522-2023-18-6-rossinskiy-chuchaev
5. Code of criminal procedure of the RSFSR of 1922 as the first Soviet procedural code: To its 100th anniversary, ed. Chuchaev A. I. Moscow: Institute of State and Law of the RAS, 2023, 216. (In Russ.)
6. Anashkin G. Z. Relevant issues of justice in the USSR. Moscow: Znanie, 1969, 48. (In Russ.)
7. Khabibullin M. Kh. Responsibility for knowingly false denunciation and knowingly false testimony under Soviet criminal law. Kazan: Kazan University, 1975, 161. (In Russ.)
8. Belkin R. S. Course in criminalistics. 3rd ed. Moscow: UNITY-Dana, 2001, 837. (In Russ.)
9. Rossinskaya E. R. Forensic examination in criminal and civil arbitration proceedings. Moscow: Law and right, 1996, 224. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tsbndp
10. A course in Soviet criminal law, eds. Piontkovsky A. A., Romashkin P. S., Chkhikvadze V. M. Moscow: Institute of State and Law of the AS USSR, 1971, vol. 6, 559. (In Russ).
11. Yudushkin S. M. Responsibility for false denunciation. Soviet justice, 1974, (2): 10–14. (In Russ.)
12. Gorelik A. S., Lobanova L. V. Crimes against justice. St. Petersburg: Legal Center Press, 2005, 491. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tkiawz
13. Brilliantov A. V., Kosevich N. R. Handbook of the judge: Crimes against justice. Moscow: Prospect, 2008, 560. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qqwkih
14. Lobanova L. V. The value of warning a person about the criminal liability for qualification of the crimes against of justice in criminal cases. Criminal Law, 2012, (3): 47–52. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/oykmrr
15. Porubov N. I. Interrogation in Soviet criminal proceedings. Minsk: Higher School, 1973, 367. (In Russ.)
16. Soloviev A. B., Center E. E. Interrogation during the preliminary investigation. Moscow: Institute for Advanced Training of Management Personnel of the USSR Prosecutor's Office, 1977, 166. (In Russ.)
17. Semenov V. A. Investigative actions in pre-trial proceedings: General provisions of theory and practice. Ekaterinburg: Ural State Law Academy, 2006, 300. (In Russ.)
18. A course in criminal proceedings, ed. Golovko L. V. Moscow: Statut, 2016, 1276. (In Russ.)
19. Sheifer S. A. Investigative actions. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2001, 208. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/nggudb
20. Tille A. A. Presumption of knowledge of laws. Jurisprudence, 1969, (3): 34–39. (In Russ.)
21. Tagantsev N. S. Russian criminal law. Moscow: Nauka, 1994, vol. 1, 380. (In Russ.)
22. Strogovich M. S. The doctrine of material truth in criminal proceedings. Moscow-Leningrad: AS USSR, 1947, 276. (In Russ.)
23. Tikhonova S. S. Legal technique in criminal law. Nizhniy Novgorod: Dekom, 2008, 244. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qraffv
24. Panchenko P. N. Presumption of the knowledge of law as a condition of guilt and responsibility in the criminal law and its treatment concerning the crimes committed in the economic activity. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the MIA of Russia, 2010, (2): 227–233. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/norpmd
25. Kuznetsov V. I. Presumption of knowledge of the law in criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation and its legal consequences. Vestnik Permskogo instituta FSIN Rossii, 2023, (1): 66–73. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/svtejj
26. Revazov M. A. Presumption of understanding the law by its recipients. Zhurnal Konstitucionnogo pravosudija, 2024, (2): 15–18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-4144-2024-2-15-18
27. Latypov V. S. The criminal procedural phenomenon of the oath: A legal rudiment or an undervalued public law procedure? The Rule of Law State: Theory and Practice, 2025, (1): 98–103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2025.1.10
